From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>, SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, mic@digikod.net,
oleg@redhat.com, tglx@kernel.org, david@kernel.org,
linmiaohe@huawei.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, rafael@kernel.org,
gnoack3000@gmail.com, ljs@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, boqun@kernel.org,
frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, urezki@gmail.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
pavel@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, mhiramat@kernel.org,
pmladek@suse.com, longman@redhat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
qiang.zhang@linux.dev, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 16:13:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907081334.1152889-3-ye.liu@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907081334.1152889-1-ye.liu@linux.dev>
From: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Replace the manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs wrapping
for_each_process()/for_each_thread() loops with for_each_process_rculock()
and for_each_thread_rculock(), which scope the RCU read lock to the
loop body via scoped_guard(rcu).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Rename *_rcu to *_rculock
mm/oom_kill.c | 20 +++++---------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 5f372f6e26fa..ef2e1c423c1d 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ static bool oom_cpuset_eligible(struct task_struct *start,
bool ret = false;
const nodemask_t *mask = oc->nodemask;
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_thread(start, tsk) {
+ for_each_thread_rculock(start, tsk) {
if (mask) {
/*
* If this is a mempolicy constrained oom, tsk's
@@ -114,7 +113,6 @@ static bool oom_cpuset_eligible(struct task_struct *start,
if (ret)
break;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -368,11 +366,9 @@ static void select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc)
else {
struct task_struct *p;
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p)
+ for_each_process_rculock(p)
if (oom_evaluate_task(p, oc))
break;
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
}
@@ -430,14 +426,12 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct oom_control *oc)
struct task_struct *p;
int i = 0;
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p) {
+ for_each_process_rculock(p) {
/* Avoid potential softlockup warning */
if ((++i & 1023) == 0)
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
dump_task(p, oc);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
}
@@ -894,8 +888,7 @@ static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
* are dying as well to make sure that a) nobody pins its mm and
* b) the task is also reapable by the oom reaper.
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p) {
+ for_each_process_rculock(p) {
if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
continue;
if (same_thread_group(task, p))
@@ -904,7 +897,6 @@ static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
if (!ret)
break;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -960,8 +952,7 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim, const char *message)
* That thread will now get access to memory reserves since it has a
* pending fatal signal.
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p) {
+ for_each_process_rculock(p) {
if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
continue;
if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
@@ -982,7 +973,6 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim, const char *message)
continue;
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
if (can_oom_reap)
queue_oom_reaper(victim);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 8:13 [PATCH v2 0/8] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] " Ye Liu
2026-09-07 8:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 9:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-07 15:42 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:20 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:13 ` Ye Liu [this message]
2026-09-07 8:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:42 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] mm/ksm: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 8:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:43 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-09 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mm/memory-failure: " Ye Liu
2026-09-07 11:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:43 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:24 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] kernel: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 12:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:53 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 17:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-07 21:05 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-07 22:27 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 22:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-08 2:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-08 6:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-09 22:14 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-08 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-07 21:28 ` SJ Park
2026-09-08 6:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-08 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-09 16:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-09 21:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] fs: " Ye Liu
2026-09-07 12:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:47 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:40 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] lib: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 12:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:47 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:42 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] security/landlock: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 12:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:49 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:44 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907081334.1152889-3-ye.liu@linux.dev \
--to=ye.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuye@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®