From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
pavan.kondeti@oss.qualcomm.com, tabba@google.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
sdonthineni@nvidia.com, steven.price@arm.com, gshan@redhat.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v17 1/1] arm64: mm: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs)
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 17:22:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907162204.1479401-2-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907162204.1479401-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
If the host attempts to access granules that have been delegated for use
in a realm these accesses will be caught and will trigger a Granule
Protection Fault (GPF).
A fault during a page walk signals a bug in the kernel and is handled by
oopsing the kernel. A non-page walk fault could be caused by user space
having access to a page which has been delegated to the kernel and will
trigger a SIGBUS to allow debugging why user space is trying to access a
delegated page.
Also, until we unmap the "private" memory pages from the linear map, we could
get spurious GPFs from within the kernel, e.g., load_unaligned_zeropad(). So,
try to fix them up for now.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
Changes since v16:
* Update the commit description to indicate why we try to fixup GPFs
Changes since v10:
* Don't call arm64_notify_die() in do_gpf() but simply return 1.
Changes since v2:
* Include missing "Granule Protection Fault at level -1"
---
arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 0b52557652be6..ad00997b1a873 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -910,6 +910,22 @@ static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
return 0;
}
+static int do_gpf_ptw(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
+
+ die_kernel_fault(inf->name, far, esr, regs);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int do_gpf(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ if (!is_el1_instruction_abort(esr) && fixup_exception(regs, esr))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
{ do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "ttbr address size fault" },
{ do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "level 1 address size fault" },
@@ -946,12 +962,12 @@ static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
{ do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 32" },
{ do_alignment_fault, SIGBUS, BUS_ADRALN, "alignment fault" },
{ do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 34" },
- { do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 35" },
- { do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 36" },
- { do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 37" },
- { do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 38" },
- { do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 39" },
- { do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 40" },
+ { do_gpf_ptw, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "level -1 granule protection fault (translation table walk)" },
+ { do_gpf_ptw, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "level 0 granule protection fault (translation table walk)" },
+ { do_gpf_ptw, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "level 1 granule protection fault (translation table walk)" },
+ { do_gpf_ptw, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "level 2 granule protection fault (translation table walk)" },
+ { do_gpf_ptw, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "level 3 granule protection fault (translation table walk)" },
+ { do_gpf, SIGBUS, SI_KERNEL, "granule protection fault" },
{ do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "level -1 address size fault" },
{ do_bad, SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL, "unknown 42" },
{ do_translation_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, "level -1 translation fault" },
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 16:22 [PATCH v17 0/1] " Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 16:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2026-09-10 17:45 ` [PATCH v17 1/1] " Catalin Marinas
2026-09-10 18:52 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-11 13:02 ` [PATCH v17 0/1] " Will Deacon
2026-09-11 16:09 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907162204.1479401-2-suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pavan.kondeti@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®