From: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
To: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: temperature: tmp006: Fix endianness byte swap in trigger handler
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 16:47:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907164733.000066f9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907082216.52821-1-salah.triki@gmail.com>
On Mon, 7 Sep 2026 09:22:15 +0100
Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com> wrote:
> In tmp006_trigger_handler(), i2c_smbus_read_word_data() is used to read
> the VOBJECT and TAMBIENT registers. However, the TMP006 stores register
> values in Big Endian byte order, while i2c_smbus_read_word_data() assumes
> Little Endian.
>
> This causes byte-swapped values to be pushed to the IIO buffer on Little
> Endian architectures, leading to corrupted sensor readings when using
> triggered buffers.
>
> Fix this by switching to i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped() inside the trigger
> handler.
>
> Fixes: 91f75ccf9f03 ("iio: temperature: tmp006: add triggered buffer support")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/temperature/tmp006.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/temperature/tmp006.c b/drivers/iio/temperature/tmp006.c
> index d9f6449ec0d8..f3b3de0bf221 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/temperature/tmp006.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/temperature/tmp006.c
> @@ -256,12 +256,12 @@ static irqreturn_t tmp006_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> } scan = { };
> s32 ret;
>
> - ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(data->client, TMP006_VOBJECT);
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped(data->client, TMP006_VOBJECT);
Sashiko has something to say:
Does this code introduce a regression where sensor readings are corrupted for
userspace clients reading from the triggered IIO buffer on Little Endian
architectures?
Before this patch, i2c_smbus_read_word_data() returned a byte-swapped word.
When this was assigned to the s16 array in tmp006_trigger_handler() on a Little
Endian CPU, the memory layout became [msb, lsb]. This implicitly matched the
IIO_BE (Big Endian) endianness declared in the tmp006_channels array, so it
worked correctly.
By switching to i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped(), the value is now in native CPU
endianness [lsb, msb]. However, the channel specification in tmp006_channels
still specifies IIO_BE:
drivers/iio/temperature/tmp006.c:tmp006_channels[] {
...
.scan_type = {
.endianness = IIO_BE,
},
...
}
Because the ABI still advertises the data as Big Endian, userspace will parse
the little-endian data as big-endian.
Should the channel specification be updated from IIO_BE to IIO_CPU, or should
scan.channels be declared as __be16 and populated using cpu_to_be16() to
preserve the existing Big Endian ABI?
--
Kind regards,
Joshua Crofts
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 8:22 Salah Triki
2026-09-07 14:47 ` Joshua Crofts [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907164733.000066f9@gmail.com \
--to=joshua.crofts1@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=salah.triki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®