mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>,
	oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] nfc: llcp: Fix race condition in accept_queue lifecycle
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 09:06:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908080638.GY2133376@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902123033.1169067-1-lee@kernel.org>

[INTENTIONAL TOP-POST]

Good morning David,

Just checking that this is on your radar this time [0].

Please let me know if you'd prefer a [RESEND].

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/016b7162-b633-4561-a003-526c9d9c5f21@ixit.cz/

Kind regards,
Lee

> In nfc_llcp_socket_release(), sockets and listener accept queues are
> walked under the local sockets rwlock and bh_lock_sock().  However,
> bh_lock_sock() does not synchronise against process-context lock_sock()
> held by nfc_llcp_accept_dequeue() during accept().  Because
> socket_release() does not check sock_owned_by_user(), both paths can
> concurrently unlink and release the same child socket, resulting in
> use-after-free or a NULL pointer dereference of child->parent in
> nfc_llcp_accept_unlink().
> 
> Fix this synchronisation race by having nfc_llcp_socket_release() use
> process-context lock_sock() instead of bh_lock_sock():
> 
> 1. Pop sockets from the local sockets list under the write lock using
>    nfc_llcp_sock_list_pop() so lock_sock() can be acquired without
>    holding the rwlock.
> 
> 2. Because lock_sock() can sleep, defer the final release of the
>    nfc_llcp_local structure to a workqueue (release_work).  This avoids
>    a sleeping-in-atomic bug when the last local reference is dropped
>    from softirq context.  Additionally, hold a single device reference
>    on local from registration until final destruction.
> 
> 3. In nfc_llcp_local_get(), use kref_get_unless_zero() to prevent
>    resurrecting a local object whose teardown has been scheduled.
> 
> 4. In llcp_sock_accept(), verify that the listener socket state is still
>    LLCP_LISTEN after waking from schedule_timeout() to prevent hangs if
>    the listener is closed concurrently.
> 
> 5. When unlinking unaccepted child sockets during listener release,
>    unlink them from local->sockets, call sock_orphan(), and drop their
>    initial sk_alloc creation reference via sock_put().
> 
> 6. Make nfc_llcp_accept_unlink() idempotent by guarding parent access with
>    a NULL check.
> 
> Fixes: 50b78b2a6500 ("NFC: Fix sleeping in atomic when releasing socket")
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - Defer local release to dedicated workqueue (llcp_wq) to avoid sleeping in atomic
> - Drain and destroy llcp_wq on module unload to prevent module exit race
> - Drop initial sk_alloc creation ref on unaccepted child sockets across all teardown paths
> - Use kref_get_unless_zero() in local_get to prevent resurrecting dying local objects
> - Check listener socket state after waking in llcp_sock_accept() to avoid hangs
> - Standardise Parent (0) -> Child (1) lockdep subclass nesting
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> - Allocate dedicated workqueue (llcp_wq) with WQ_UNBOUND to fix syzbot warning
> 
>  net/nfc/llcp.h      |   1 +
>  net/nfc/llcp_core.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  net/nfc/llcp_sock.c |  49 +++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp.h b/net/nfc/llcp.h
> index d8345ed57c95..23ae7a0112d3 100644
> --- a/net/nfc/llcp.h
> +++ b/net/nfc/llcp.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct nfc_llcp_local {
>  	struct hlist_head pending_sdreqs;
>  	struct timer_list sdreq_timer;
>  	struct work_struct sdreq_timeout_work;
> +	struct work_struct release_work;
>  	u8 sdreq_next_tid;
>  
>  	/* sockets array */
> diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
> index bd6361e2efa4..23553e7426ec 100644
> --- a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
> +++ b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(llcp_devices);
>  /* Protects llcp_devices list */
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(llcp_devices_lock);
>  
> +static struct workqueue_struct *llcp_wq;
> +
>  static void nfc_llcp_rx_skb(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, struct sk_buff *skb);
>  
>  void nfc_llcp_sock_link(struct llcp_sock_list *l, struct sock *sk)
> @@ -63,21 +65,33 @@ static void nfc_llcp_socket_purge(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static struct sock *nfc_llcp_sock_list_pop(struct llcp_sock_list *l)
> +{
> +	struct sock *sk;
> +
> +	write_lock(&l->lock);
> +	sk = sk_head(&l->head);
> +	if (sk) {
> +		sock_hold(sk);
> +		sk_del_node_init(sk);
> +	}
> +	write_unlock(&l->lock);
> +
> +	return sk;
> +}
> +
>  static void nfc_llcp_socket_release(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, bool device,
>  				    int err)
>  {
>  	struct sock *sk;
> -	struct hlist_node *tmp;
>  	struct nfc_llcp_sock *llcp_sock;
>  
>  	skb_queue_purge(&local->tx_queue);
>  
> -	write_lock(&local->sockets.lock);
> -
> -	sk_for_each_safe(sk, tmp, &local->sockets.head) {
> +	while ((sk = nfc_llcp_sock_list_pop(&local->sockets))) {
>  		llcp_sock = nfc_llcp_sock(sk);
>  
> -		bh_lock_sock(sk);
> +		lock_sock(sk);
>  
>  		nfc_llcp_socket_purge(llcp_sock);
>  
> @@ -91,17 +105,27 @@ static void nfc_llcp_socket_release(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, bool device,
>  			list_for_each_entry_safe(lsk, n,
>  						 &llcp_sock->accept_queue,
>  						 accept_queue) {
> +				bool put_creation = false;
> +
>  				accept_sk = &lsk->sk;
> -				bh_lock_sock(accept_sk);
> +				lock_sock_nested(accept_sk,
> +						 SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>  
> -				nfc_llcp_accept_unlink(accept_sk);
> +				if (nfc_llcp_sock(accept_sk)->parent == sk) {
> +					nfc_llcp_accept_unlink(accept_sk);
> +					nfc_llcp_sock_unlink(&local->sockets, accept_sk);
>  
> -				if (err)
> -					accept_sk->sk_err = err;
> -				accept_sk->sk_state = LLCP_CLOSED;
> -				accept_sk->sk_state_change(sk);
> +					if (err)
> +						accept_sk->sk_err = err;
> +					accept_sk->sk_state = LLCP_CLOSED;
> +					accept_sk->sk_state_change(accept_sk);
> +					sock_orphan(accept_sk);
> +					put_creation = true;
> +				}
>  
> -				bh_unlock_sock(accept_sk);
> +				release_sock(accept_sk);
> +				if (put_creation)
> +					sock_put(accept_sk); /* creation ref */
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> @@ -110,23 +134,18 @@ static void nfc_llcp_socket_release(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, bool device,
>  		sk->sk_state = LLCP_CLOSED;
>  		sk->sk_state_change(sk);
>  
> -		bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> -
> -		sk_del_node_init(sk);
> +		release_sock(sk);
> +		sock_put(sk);
>  	}
>  
> -	write_unlock(&local->sockets.lock);
> -
>  	/* If we still have a device, we keep the RAW sockets alive */
>  	if (device == true)
>  		return;
>  
> -	write_lock(&local->raw_sockets.lock);
> -
> -	sk_for_each_safe(sk, tmp, &local->raw_sockets.head) {
> +	while ((sk = nfc_llcp_sock_list_pop(&local->raw_sockets))) {
>  		llcp_sock = nfc_llcp_sock(sk);
>  
> -		bh_lock_sock(sk);
> +		lock_sock(sk);
>  
>  		nfc_llcp_socket_purge(llcp_sock);
>  
> @@ -135,26 +154,20 @@ static void nfc_llcp_socket_release(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, bool device,
>  		sk->sk_state = LLCP_CLOSED;
>  		sk->sk_state_change(sk);
>  
> -		bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> -
> -		sk_del_node_init(sk);
> +		release_sock(sk);
> +		sock_put(sk);
>  	}
> -
> -	write_unlock(&local->raw_sockets.lock);
>  }
>  
>  static struct nfc_llcp_local *nfc_llcp_local_get(struct nfc_llcp_local *local)
>  {
> -	/* Since using nfc_llcp_local may result in usage of nfc_dev, whenever
> -	 * we hold a reference to local, we also need to hold a reference to
> -	 * the device to avoid UAF.
> -	 */
> -	if (!nfc_get_device(local->dev->idx))
> +	if (!local)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	kref_get(&local->ref);
> +	if (kref_get_unless_zero(&local->ref))
> +		return local;
>  
> -	return local;
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static void local_cleanup(struct nfc_llcp_local *local)
> @@ -172,30 +185,34 @@ static void local_cleanup(struct nfc_llcp_local *local)
>  	nfc_llcp_free_sdp_tlv_list(&local->pending_sdreqs);
>  }
>  
> +static void local_release_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct nfc_llcp_local *local;
> +	struct nfc_dev *dev;
> +
> +	local = container_of(work, struct nfc_llcp_local, release_work);
> +	dev = local->dev;
> +
> +	local_cleanup(local);
> +	kfree(local);
> +	nfc_put_device(dev);
> +}
> +
>  static void local_release(struct kref *ref)
>  {
>  	struct nfc_llcp_local *local;
>  
>  	local = container_of(ref, struct nfc_llcp_local, ref);
>  
> -	local_cleanup(local);
> -	kfree(local);
> +	queue_work(llcp_wq, &local->release_work);
>  }
>  
>  int nfc_llcp_local_put(struct nfc_llcp_local *local)
>  {
> -	struct nfc_dev *dev;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	if (local == NULL)
> +	if (!local)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	dev = local->dev;
> -
> -	ret = kref_put(&local->ref, local_release);
> -	nfc_put_device(dev);
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return kref_put(&local->ref, local_release);
>  }
>  
>  static struct nfc_llcp_sock *nfc_llcp_sock_get(struct nfc_llcp_local *local,
> @@ -1705,6 +1722,7 @@ int nfc_llcp_register_device(struct nfc_dev *ndev)
>  	INIT_WORK(&local->rx_work, nfc_llcp_rx_work);
>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&local->timeout_work, nfc_llcp_timeout_work);
> +	INIT_WORK(&local->release_work, local_release_work);
>  
>  	rwlock_init(&local->sockets.lock);
>  	rwlock_init(&local->connecting_sockets.lock);
> @@ -1748,10 +1766,23 @@ void nfc_llcp_unregister_device(struct nfc_dev *dev)
>  
>  int __init nfc_llcp_init(void)
>  {
> -	return nfc_llcp_sock_init();
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	llcp_wq = alloc_workqueue("nfc_llcp_wq", WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
> +	if (!llcp_wq)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = nfc_llcp_sock_init();
> +	if (ret) {
> +		destroy_workqueue(llcp_wq);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void nfc_llcp_exit(void)
>  {
>  	nfc_llcp_sock_exit();
> +	destroy_workqueue(llcp_wq);
>  }
> diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
> index 5558d8a4d48b..ce6875eb58fb 100644
> --- a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
> +++ b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
> @@ -392,11 +392,12 @@ void nfc_llcp_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk)
>  
>  	pr_debug("state %d\n", sk->sk_state);
>  
> -	list_del_init(&llcp_sock->accept_queue);
> -	sk_acceptq_removed(llcp_sock->parent);
> -	llcp_sock->parent = NULL;
> -
> -	sock_put(sk);
> +	if (llcp_sock->parent) {
> +		list_del_init(&llcp_sock->accept_queue);
> +		sk_acceptq_removed(llcp_sock->parent);
> +		llcp_sock->parent = NULL;
> +		sock_put(sk);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  void nfc_llcp_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk)
> @@ -423,12 +424,20 @@ struct sock *nfc_llcp_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent,
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(lsk, n, &llcp_parent->accept_queue,
>  				 accept_queue) {
> +		struct nfc_llcp_local *local;
> +
>  		sk = &lsk->sk;
> -		lock_sock(sk);
> +		lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>  
>  		if (sk->sk_state == LLCP_CLOSED) {
> -			release_sock(sk);
> +			local = nfc_llcp_sock(sk)->local;
> +
>  			nfc_llcp_accept_unlink(sk);
> +			if (local)
> +				nfc_llcp_sock_unlink(&local->sockets, sk);
> +			sock_orphan(sk);
> +			release_sock(sk);
> +			sock_put(sk);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -464,7 +473,7 @@ static int llcp_sock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,
>  
>  	pr_debug("parent %p\n", sk);
>  
> -	lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +	lock_sock(sk);
>  
>  	if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_LISTEN) {
>  		ret = -EBADFD;
> @@ -490,7 +499,12 @@ static int llcp_sock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,
>  
>  		release_sock(sk);
>  		timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
> -		lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +		lock_sock(sk);
> +
> +		if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_LISTEN) {
> +			ret = -EBADFD;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>  	remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> @@ -629,13 +643,24 @@ static int llcp_sock_release(struct socket *sock)
>  
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(lsk, n, &llcp_sock->accept_queue,
>  					 accept_queue) {
> +			bool put_creation = false;
> +
>  			accept_sk = &lsk->sk;
> -			lock_sock(accept_sk);
> +			lock_sock_nested(accept_sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>  
> -			nfc_llcp_send_disconnect(lsk);
> -			nfc_llcp_accept_unlink(accept_sk);
> +			if (nfc_llcp_sock(accept_sk)->parent == sk) {
> +				nfc_llcp_send_disconnect(lsk);
> +				nfc_llcp_accept_unlink(accept_sk);
> +				nfc_llcp_sock_unlink(&local->sockets, accept_sk);
> +
> +				accept_sk->sk_state = LLCP_CLOSED;
> +				sock_orphan(accept_sk);
> +				put_creation = true;
> +			}
>  
>  			release_sock(accept_sk);
> +			if (put_creation)
> +				sock_put(accept_sk); /* creation ref */
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.55.0.966.g6673acef38-goog
> 

-- 
Lee Jones

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-08  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 12:30 Lee Jones
2026-09-08  8:06 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2026-09-08 10:29   ` David Heidelberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260908080638.GY2133376@google.com \
    --to=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@ixit.cz \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=szymon.janc@tieto.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®