From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD3154A3866; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 08:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788857369; cv=none; b=mYUS3RQDDp428XirPT31uy9dOrhAXKLsT6PYDGdPf7msRpEojxYh9SdFF4i3lYAd5/ANSVqoTG6utyAHwb1BSt5SvfJUuxHdcSkHsYM0wEm9GYKQ1jJiGM17Hxdt3bwC1Bm094SsT5l+lWL39A3lejkhl5JiOVkAYjAS+4BRiVI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788857369; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PFQeJIbTX8JBAIp6rzNV6zMDoYh0Nr7CbSnGpHlGoSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dV+g0YcGsDtrcluiV95YZ2CabB7m3OouruLSZrNhcPkq2g0pMW3CNEUh4wlHHWQRU6iaSP9ff3riVN6aWqW6jsvLpbd9p/cGQ35WFsBw7ssNyj/cp55phmvC6TDjVFzxWteP4rmjFGTVakRRMet1eOhPYzo/eMmjdDJ+EsA1cO4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Za0qhaVT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Za0qhaVT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70F871F00A3A; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 08:49:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788857363; bh=dE9rRwZnG7wy+FNbCUDTd+rt4SiIbzZl8SrVSqhT7tg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Za0qhaVToEDzllqVbChCSLXE5WB1iKgz+ynDZftVHGC/BPnKP8euNN8pErhFxlaLu cHEky/zmqJKTEoHFGUbQ6esxUJqHuT0+Qb67FHr+ZAZojYH6qEOd5aKLg2oCTlpOAT qro2T8ioUiSyW4eq3M7P+UDt6yPwgrTPasLZsl4HJkn3kibpWQepVGDtqshknZw64d QyY6QeByxDFVpPJXmAOw6oOijNO9CtPKUnHQkJk+ZVmp6NhI8pVc91xXr6XcWOSgpZ AO+7tS6hP6g8CFhaj/1KcwJs6mKoLXjIlpUTfzRu9cCqxcajolDa2NAicthKxyuwH2 hMENyrzZnIz0Q== Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 09:49:19 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Bui Duc Phuc Cc: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org, radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, michal.simek@amd.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, hancock@sedsystems.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] net: xilinx: axienet: Handle optional IRQ return value correctly Message-ID: <20260908084919.GM40544@horms.kernel.org> References: <20260903073252.339250-3-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> <178880965410.219967.16945994924537630103@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 09:32:32AM +0700, Bui Duc Phuc wrote: > > Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 (1) · Low: 0 > > > > - [Medium] net: xilinx: axienet: Handle optional IRQ return value > > correctly — the patch carries a `Fixes: 522856cefaf0` tag and a… > > > > OK, agreed, I'll drop the Fixes tag in this case, since this is a > no-op cleanup rather than an actual behavior fix. Thanks, with that addressed this looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman -- pw-bot: changes-requested