From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<laoar.shao@gmail.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <jgross@suse.com>,
<kees@kernel.org>, <jpoimboe@kernel.org>, <rppt@kernel.org>,
<sohil.mehta@intel.com>, <linusw@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tiozhang@didiglobal.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/kprobe: Fix crash when probe cs call
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 10:44:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908104425.98040997699efaa2bc741e0b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907192416.GA4979@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000>
On Tue, 8 Sep 2026 03:24:16 +0800
Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com> wrote:
> When I used eBPF to probe the call instructions within a function,
> we encountered a kernel crash.
>
> The ebpf tool probes the 257 offset of the __hrtimer_run_queues
> function.
>
> <__hrtimer_run_queues+249>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> <__hrtimer_run_queues+254>: mov %r14,%rdi
> <__hrtimer_run_queues+257>: cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12>
> <__hrtimer_run_queues+263>: mov %eax,%r12d
> <__hrtimer_run_queues+266>: xchg %ax,%ax
> <__hrtimer_run_queues+268>: mov %r13,%rdi
>
> The scene of kernel crash is as follows:
>
> [73665.737181] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9
> [73665.744253] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> [73665.749643] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> [73665.754843] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [73665.757390] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [73665.761073] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P
> [73665.782671] RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230
>
> Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is
> at the 6th byte of the above cs call instruction. Since the cs call
> instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that
> call instruction.
>
> The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a
> function, kprobe with int3 is used as the underlying implementation.
> During single-step emulation of the original call instruction,
> int3_emulate_call assumes that the probed call instruction is 5 bytes
> long. However, the actual CS-prefixed call instruction occupies 6 bytes,
> so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU
> returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at
> the address of the last byte of that CS call instruction. Coincidentally,
> starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely
> different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash.
>
> Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from
> the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return
> address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro.
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step")
> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com>
Thanks for fixing! I have just one comment here;
[...]
> @@ -2180,8 +2181,14 @@ int3_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val, void *data
>
> if (regs->ip - INT3_INSN_SIZE != selftest)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> -
> - int3_emulate_call(regs, (unsigned long)&int3_selftest_callee);
> + /*
> + * As seen in int3_selftest_asm, the effective return address
> + * should be placed immediately after the instruction sequence
> + * [int3; nop; nop; nop; nop.]. Therefore, CALL_INSN_SIZE works
> + * perfectly well here.
Nit: This explanation is somewhat wrong. alternatives only support 5-byte
call. The TEXT_POKE_MAX_OPCODE_SIZE is 5. When len == 6, alternative.c
explicitly reserves this only for 0x0f prefixed Jcc.d32
See alternative.c
> /*
> * NOTE: crazy scheme to allow patching Jcc.d32 but not increase the size of
> * this thing. When len == 6 everything is prefixed with 0x0f and we map
> * opcode to Jcc.d8, using len to distinguish.
> */
So we don't need to take care of 6 bytes call here.
Others looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
BTW, can this be picked via tip tree ? or I can pick it.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 19:24 Jinke Han
2026-09-08 1:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-09-08 5:00 Jinke Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908104425.98040997699efaa2bc741e0b@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jinkehan@didiglobal.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tiozhang@didiglobal.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®