From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf test: waiting.sh: Replace timestamp polling with sleep
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 18:20:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908152053.192830-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (raw)
The waiting helpers implement timeouts using:
date +%s%1N
This relies on GNU coreutils date truncating %N to the specified width,
so %1N yields tenths of a second.
Rust coreutils (uutils) interprets the width differently and does not
truncate the nanoseconds field. Consequently "date +%1N" returns all
nine nanosecond digits, causing the elapsed-time calculation to be done
in nanoseconds while timeout values remain in tenths of a second.
As a result, timeout comparisons succeed immediately and the waiting
helpers time out on their first iteration. This causes
test_intel_pt.sh to fail on systems using uutils "date".
Avoid implementation-specific date formatting entirely. Instead, wait
for 100 ms on each iteration and count the timeout down. Besides fixing
the portability issue, this removes the busy-waiting behaviour in
wait_for_perf_to_start(), which could otherwise consume CPU while
waiting for perf record to start.
Since the timeout is now based on repeated sleeps, it is only
approximate. Update the comments accordingly. Also make is_running()
wait for exactly the documented number of tenths by changing its timeout
test from -gt to the new logic, and quote tm_out in the modified code.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/waiting.sh | 34 +++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/waiting.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/waiting.sh
index 3a152892e077..43f4322dbe9e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/waiting.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/waiting.sh
@@ -1,77 +1,75 @@
#!/bin/bash
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-tenths=date\ +%s%1N
-
# Wait for PID $1 to have $2 number of threads started
-# Time out after $3 tenths of a second or 5 seconds if $3 is ""
+# Time out after approx. $3 tenths of a second or 5 seconds if $3 is ""
wait_for_threads()
{
tm_out=$3 ; [ -n "${tm_out}" ] || tm_out=50
- start_time=$($tenths)
while [ -e "/proc/$1/task" ] ; do
th_cnt=$(find "/proc/$1/task" -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -printf x | wc -c)
if [ "${th_cnt}" -ge "$2" ] ; then
return 0
fi
- # Wait at most tm_out tenths of a second
- if [ $(($($tenths) - start_time)) -ge $tm_out ] ; then
+ if [ "${tm_out}" -le 0 ] ; then
echo "PID $1 does not have $2 threads"
return 1
fi
+ sleep 0.1
+ tm_out=$((tm_out - 1))
done
return 1
}
# Wait for perf record -vvv 2>$2 with PID $1 to start by looking at file $2
# It depends on capturing perf record debug message "perf record has started"
-# Time out after $3 tenths of a second or 5 seconds if $3 is ""
+# Time out after approx. $3 tenths of a second or 5 seconds if $3 is ""
wait_for_perf_to_start()
{
tm_out=$3 ; [ -n "${tm_out}" ] || tm_out=50
echo "Waiting for \"perf record has started\" message"
- start_time=$($tenths)
while [ -e "/proc/$1" ] ; do
if grep -q "perf record has started" "$2" ; then
echo OK
break
fi
- # Wait at most tm_out tenths of a second
- if [ $(($($tenths) - start_time)) -ge $tm_out ] ; then
+ if [ "${tm_out}" -le 0 ] ; then
echo "perf recording did not start"
return 1
fi
+ sleep 0.1
+ tm_out=$((tm_out - 1))
done
return 0
}
# Wait for process PID %1 to exit
-# Time out after $2 tenths of a second or 5 seconds if $2 is ""
+# Time out after approx. $2 tenths of a second or 5 seconds if $2 is ""
wait_for_process_to_exit()
{
tm_out=$2 ; [ -n "${tm_out}" ] || tm_out=50
- start_time=$($tenths)
while [ -e "/proc/$1" ] ; do
- # Wait at most tm_out tenths of a second
- if [ $(($($tenths) - start_time)) -ge $tm_out ] ; then
+ if [ "${tm_out}" -le 0 ] ; then
echo "PID $1 did not exit as expected"
return 1
fi
+ sleep 0.1
+ tm_out=$((tm_out - 1))
done
return 0
}
-# Check if PID $1 is still running after $2 tenths of a second
+# Check if PID $1 is still running after approx. $2 tenths of a second
# or 0.3 seconds if $2 is ""
is_running()
{
tm_out=$2 ; [ -n "${tm_out}" ] || tm_out=3
- start_time=$($tenths)
while [ -e "/proc/$1" ] ; do
- # Check for at least tm_out tenths of a second
- if [ $(($($tenths) - start_time)) -gt $tm_out ] ; then
+ if [ "${tm_out}" -le 0 ] ; then
return 0
fi
+ sleep 0.1
+ tm_out=$((tm_out - 1))
done
echo "PID $1 exited prematurely"
return 1
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 15:20 Adrian Hunter [this message]
2026-09-08 17:14 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-08 21:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908152053.192830-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®