mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>, Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: word-at-a-time: improve find_zero() for Zbb
Date: Wed,  9 Sep 2026 07:53:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908235312.8440-4-jszhang@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908235312.8440-1-jszhang@kernel.org>

In commit f915a3e5b018 ("arm64: word-at-a-time: improve byte count
calculations for LE"), Linus improved the find_zero() for arm64 LE.
Do the same optimization as he did: "do __ffs() on the intermediate value
that found whether there is a zero byte, before we've actually computed
the final byte mask.", so that we share the similar improvements:

"The difference between the old and the new implementation is that
"count_zero()" ends up scheduling better because it is being done on a
value that is available earlier (before the final mask).

But more importantly, it can be implemented without the insane semantics
of the standard bit finding helpers that have the off-by-one issue and
have to special-case the zero mask situation."

Before the patch:
0000000000000000 <find_zero>:
   0:	c909                	beqz	a0,12 <.L1>
   2:	60051793          	clz	a5,a0
   6:	03f00513          	li	a0,63
   a:	8d1d                	sub	a0,a0,a5
   c:	2505                	addiw	a0,a0,1
   e:	4035551b          	sraiw	a0,a0,0x3

0000000000000012 <.L1>:
  12:	8082                	ret

After the patch:

0000000000000000 <find_zero>:
   0:	60151513          	ctz	a0,a0
   4:	810d                	srli	a0,a0,0x3
   6:	8082                	ret

7 instructions vs 3 instructions!

As can be seen, on RV64 w/ Zbb, the new "find_zero()" ends up just
"ctz" plus the shift right that then ends up being subsumed by the
"add to final length".

But I have no HW platform which supports Zbb, so I can't get the
performance improvement numbers by the last patch, only built and
tested the patch on QEMU.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h
index f2d16c1eea8d..31240133eccd 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ static inline unsigned long prep_zero_mask(unsigned long val,
 
 static inline unsigned long create_zero_mask(unsigned long bits)
 {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB) &&
+	    riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB))
+		return bits;
+
 	bits = (bits - 1) & ~bits;
 	return bits >> 7;
 }
@@ -67,13 +71,21 @@ static inline unsigned long find_zero(unsigned long mask)
 {
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB) &&
 	    riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB))
-		return !mask ? 0 : ((__fls(mask) + 1) >> 3);
+		return __ffs(mask) >> 3;
 
 	return count_masked_bytes(mask);
 }
 
-/* The mask we created is directly usable as a bytemask */
-#define zero_bytemask(mask) (mask)
+static inline unsigned long zero_bytemask(unsigned long bits)
+{
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB) &&
+	    riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB)) {
+		bits = (bits - 1) & ~bits;
+		return bits >> 7;
+	}
+
+	return bits;
+}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
 
-- 
2.53.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 23:53 [PATCH v3 0/3] riscv: word-at-a-time: improve find_zero() Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-08 23:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] riscv: word-at-a-time: improve find_zero() for !RISCV_ISA_ZBB Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-08 23:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] riscv: word-at-a-time: improve find_zero() without Zbb Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-08 23:53 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260908235312.8440-4-jszhang@kernel.org \
    --to=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®