From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Coiby Xu" <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Baoquan He" <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
"Jinjie Ruan" <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Dave Young" <ruirui.yang@linux.dev>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org,
"Sourabh Jain" <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] crash_dump: Disallow configfs/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse if crash hotplug supported
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:53:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909005342.C11AF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909003657.1570544-9-coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Setting `image->dm_crypt_keys_addr = 0` during kexec image cleanup bypasses page table memory protections, leaving sensitive dm-crypt volume logon keys accessible/readable in the primary kernel's memory.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Reused dm-crypt keys are permanently lost and silently dropped during ARM64 kexec segment placement retries due to premature freeing of `keys_header`.
--
commit ccd76380ffc2464293abaa1bf7ed098e55227890
Author: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
crash_dump: Disallow configfs/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse if crash hotplug supported
If crash hotplug is supported, dm-crypt keys saved to reserved memory
will be taken care of automatically. Thus it doesn't make sense to use
configfs/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse. Not reserving
image->dm_crypt_keys_addr makes it implicitly to disallow using this
API. Currently x86_64 and ppc64le have implemented crash hotplug
feature.
Also update the doc accordingly. Note two doc issues are fixed as well.
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c b/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
> index bc70fbb79e0f6..666c1f0c9e3b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -522,14 +522,18 @@ int crash_load_dm_crypt_keys(struct kimage *image)
> void crash_dm_crypt_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> {
> /*
> - * For CPU/memory hot-plugging, the kdump image will be reloaded. Prevent
> - * keys_header from being cleaned up during unloading when
> - * is_dm_key_reused=true
> + * For CPU/memory hot-plugging without CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG, the whole kdump
> + * image will be reloaded. Prevent keys_header from being cleaned up during
> + * unloading when is_dm_key_reused=true
> */
> if (!is_dm_key_reused) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can reused dm-crypt keys be permanently
lost during ARM64 kexec segment placement retries due to premature freeing
of keys_header?
On ARM64, if the first kexec segment placement attempt succeeds for dm-crypt
keys but fails on a subsequent segment (like initrd), it triggers a retry
loop. On the first pass, crash_load_dm_crypt_keys() unsets the
is_dm_key_reused flag:
kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c:crash_load_dm_crypt_keys() {
...
out:
is_dm_key_reused = false;
return r;
}
The error path then calls crash_dm_crypt_cleanup(), which unconditionally
frees keys_header since the flag is now false:
arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c:image_load() {
...
image->nr_segments -= 1;
kbuf.buf_min = kernel_segment->mem + kernel_segment->memsz;
kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
crash_dm_crypt_cleanup(image);
...
}
On the next iteration, crash_load_dm_crypt_keys() is called again but exits
early without allocating keys, leaving the crash kernel without decryption
keys.
> kfree_sensitive(keys_header);
> keys_header = NULL;
> }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG
> + if (image->hotplug_support)
> + image->dm_crypt_keys_addr = 0;
[Severity: High]
Does setting image->dm_crypt_keys_addr to 0 bypass page table memory
protections, leaving sensitive dm-crypt volume logon keys accessible in the
primary kernel's memory?
When crash_dm_crypt_cleanup() is called during kexec file load, it zeroes
image->dm_crypt_keys_addr. Subsequently, sys_kexec_file_load() applies
memory protections:
kernel/kexec_file.c:sys_kexec_file_load() {
...
kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(image);
exchange:
image = xchg(dest_image, image);
out:
#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
if ((flags & KEXEC_FILE_ON_CRASH) && kexec_crash_image)
arch_kexec_protect_crashkres();
...
}
Immediately afterward, kexec_mark_dm_crypt_keys() (called by
arch_kexec_protect_crashkres()) checks this address:
arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c:kexec_mark_dm_crypt_keys() {
...
if (kexec_crash_image->dm_crypt_keys_addr) {
start_paddr = kexec_crash_image->dm_crypt_keys_addr;
...
set_memory_np(...);
...
}
Since the address evaluates to 0, it completely skips applying the
non-present page table protections (set_memory_np()), exposing decryption
keys in system RAM.
> +#endif
> }
>
> static int __init configfs_dmcrypt_keys_init(void)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909003657.1570544-1-coiby.xu@gmail.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260909003657.1570544-1-coiby.xu@gmail.com>
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] crash_dump: Fix potential double free and UAF of keys_header Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 13:27 ` Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] crash_dump: Read the number of dm-crypt keys from reserved memory Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] crash_dump: Disallow writing to dm-crypt configfs during kexec_file_load syscall Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 13:29 ` Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] crash_dump: Free temporary dm-crypt keys_header buffer in kdump kernel Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] crash_dump: Only use kexec_dprintk during the kexec_file_load syscall Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] crash_dump: Improve readability of config_keys_restore_store Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] crash_dump: Check the function return codes in restore_dm_crypt_keys_to_thread_keyring Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] crash_dump: Disallow configfs/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse if crash hotplug supported Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 5:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-09-09 13:33 ` Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:36 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: kdump: Add arm64 and ppc64le to encrypted dump target support list Coiby Xu
2026-09-09 0:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 5:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-09-09 13:34 ` Coiby Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909005342.C11AF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=coiby.xu@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®