From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Use old domain parameter when attaching the blocking domain
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 15:51:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909075106.738691-6-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909075106.738691-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
blocking_domain_attach_dev() drops the old domain’s iopf reference using
info->domain, but that value may already be cleared by
device_block_translation().
On attach failure fallback paths, this can cause the function to drop a
NULL-domain ref instead of @old, leaking the real old-domain reference.
Repeated leaks grow info->iopf_refcount, keep the device stuck on the
iopf queue, and can trigger WARN_ON(info->iopf_refcount) when PRI is
disabled.
Use the core-provided @old parameter directly. It always identifies the
correct domain to release and matches other attach paths.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 5553c57130f7..99cf6716f602 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -2899,9 +2899,7 @@ static int blocking_domain_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev,
struct iommu_domain *old)
{
- struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
-
- iopf_for_domain_remove(info->domain ? &info->domain->domain : NULL, dev);
+ iopf_for_domain_remove(old, dev);
device_block_translation(dev);
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 7:50 [PATCH 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix issues reported by Sashiko Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Avoid out-of-range shift in qi_desc_dev_iotlb_pasid() Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Do not ignore context table copy failures Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Handle DID reservation errors when copying context tables Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Reserve scalable-mode DIDs from PASID entries during copy Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix iopf refcount leak in nested attach Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Drop old iopf ref only after attach succeeds Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909075106.738691-6-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®