mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
	Tingwei Zhang <tingwei.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: Fix clock refcount imbalance on platform probe failure
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 10:28:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909092817.GC200420@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907-fix-clk-issue-v1-1-efe81fa2b697@oss.qualcomm.com>

Hi Jie,

Thanks for fixing! It is shame that my single patch caused issues both
in driver's probe and remove - I have to admit that I don't understand
runtime PM's state machine.

TBC, this patch only fixes probe. The driver's remove is fixed in:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20260710-fix-clock-refcount-unbalance-v3-0-a37a1fb17981@oss.qualcomm.com/

The series above and this patch should be picked up together so can
have complete fix.

> The probe wrapper then unconditionally calls pm_runtime_put()
> regardless of whether the inner probe succeeded, so on failure this
> also fires runtime_suspend() and disables the same clocks a first
> time.

pm_runtime_put() can be used for success case, but for the failure
case, we should disable the runtime PM but not release reference:
https://docs.kernel.org/power/runtime_pm.html#runtime-pm-initialization-device-probing-and-removal

> @@ -632,11 +632,14 @@ static int catu_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>  
>  	ret = __catu_probe(&pdev->dev, res);
> -	pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>  		pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);

Nitpick: please reverse the sequence between pm_runtime_put_noidle()
and pm_runtime_disable(). As we need to first disable runtime PM for
the device, then release usage reference.

Since the driver core will reset device's active state, AI told me that
calling pm_runtime_set_suspended() is redundant. It is still good to
explicitly call it for bookkeeping. This can be aligned with the change
in driver remove.

Thus, please update the flow:

        pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
        pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
        pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);

With the update:

Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07  6:03 Jie Gan
2026-09-09  9:28 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-09-09 12:28   ` Jie Gan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909092817.GC200420@e132581.arm.com \
    --to=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tingwei.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®