From: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
To: sj@kernel.org
Cc: aethernet65535@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
corbet@lwn.net, damon@lists.linux.dev, david@kernel.org,
liam@infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ljs@kernel.org,
mhocko@suse.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, rppt@kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Docs/mm/damon/design: clarify when qt_exceeds increases
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 18:07:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909100913.30568-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909003800.112569-1-sj@kernel.org>
On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 17:38:00 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi Liew,
>
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 01:50:23 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > qt_exceeds counts how many times the quota of a scheme has exceeded.
> >
> > The value can confuse users when the effective size quota is zero,
> > because a zero effective size quota does not always mean the quotas are
> > unset.
> >
> > If the quotas are unset, that is, both ms and bytes are zero and no
> > quota goal is set, qt_exceeds never increases. But if the user uses
> > the temporal auto-tuning algorithm, the effective size quota becomes
> > zero once the goal is [over-]achieved. In that case the quotas are
> > still set, so qt_exceeds keeps increasing once per quota reset
> > interval while the goal stays achieved.
> >
> > Clarify this on the design document.
>
> Thank you for keep working on this with patience.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > By the way, I found a thing in the design document that confused me.
> >
> > temporal: More straightforward algorithm. Tries to achieve the goal
> > as fast as possible, using maximum allowed quota, but only for a
> > temporal short time. ---> When the quota is under-achieved, this
> > algorithm keeps tuning quota to a maximum allowed one. Once the
> > quota is [over]-achieved <---, this sets the quota zero. Useful for
> > deterministic control required environments.
> >
> > I'm not sure if "goal" was accidentally written as "quota" here. Would
> > this be better?
> >
> > When the goal is under-achieved, this algorithm keeps tuning quota
> > to a maximum allowed one. Once the goal is [over-]achieved, [...]
>
> Good eyes! Yes, seems it was only mistakenly written in the way. Please feel
> free to send a separate patch or include it into the next version of this
> patch, whatever better for you.
I will send a separate patch.
>
> >
> > ---
> > Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> > index d036340dae8a..e083b74d618b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> > @@ -863,6 +863,16 @@ scheme's execution.
> > completely tried to be applied.
> > - ``max_nr_snapshots``: Upper limit of ``nr_snapshots``.
> >
> > +``qt_exceeds`` is increased for schemes with set quotas when the quota is found
> > +full at a quota reset interval boundary. While the quotas are unset,
> > +``qt_exceeds`` never increased. However, a zero effective size quota does not
> > +always mean the quotas are unset, if the ``temporal`` :ref:`auto-tuning
> > +algorithm <damon_design_damos_quotas_auto_tuning>` is used, the effective size
> > +quota is set to zero once the goal is [over-]achieved. Since a set quota of
> > +zero effective size is always considered full, ``qt_exceeds`` keeps being
> > +increased once per quota reset interval in that case, until the goal is
> > +under-achieved again.
> > +
> > "A scheme is tried to be applied to a region" means DAMOS core logic determined
> > the region is eligible to apply the scheme's :ref:`action
> > <damon_design_damos_action>`. The :ref:`access pattern
>
> I think the clarification is better to be added to the 'temporal' quota tuner,
> since this happens only when it is used. Maybe the clarification could also be
> shorter. For example,
>
> '''
> --- a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> @@ -775,7 +775,9 @@ There are two such tuning algorithms that users can select as they need.
> fast as possible, using maximum allowed quota, but only for a temporal short
> time. When the quota is under-achieved, this algorithm keeps tuning quota to
> a maximum allowed one. Once the quota is [over]-achieved, this sets the
> - quota zero. Useful for deterministic control required environments.
> + quota zero. Useful for deterministic control required environments. Note
> + that the zero quota is a valid quota, and therefore ``qt_exceeds`` :ref:`stat
> + <damon_design_damos_stat>` will keep increasing in the case.
>
> The goal can be specified with five parameters, namely ``target_metric``,
> ``target_value``, ``current_value``, ``nid`` and ``path``. The auto-tuning
> '''
>
> What do you think, Liew?
I agree that would be better. Although users might look up the
definition of qt_exceeds first, they are also likely to navigate
directly to the temporal section.
I will clarify at the temporal section in the next revision.
Best regards,
Rui Yan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 17:50 Liew Rui Yan
2026-09-09 0:38 ` SJ Park
2026-09-09 10:07 ` Liew Rui Yan [this message]
2026-09-10 0:17 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909100913.30568-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--to=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®