From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Oleg Keri <okerixx@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@linux.microsoft.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] arm64: topology: fix arch_freq_get_on_cpu() overflow above 4.19 GHz
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:36:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909113625.000063be@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08ee55292c1cedf26067d1a2b02fa5657d9650e8.1788712186.git.okerixx@gmail.com>
On Sun, 6 Sep 2026 18:37:14 +0200
Oleg Keri <okerixx@gmail.com> wrote:
> arch_freq_get_on_cpu() computes the product of the frequency scale and
> the reference frequency as a u64, but assigns it to an unsigned int
> before shifting it back down:
>
> freq = scale * arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
> freq >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
>
> The product is truncated to 32 bits before the shift, so the result
> wraps once arch_scale_freq_ref() exceeds 2^32 / SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE,
> i.e. 4194304 kHz.
>
> On a Snapdragon X2 Elite (Glymur) laptop, whose boost OPP is 4723200
> kHz, cpuinfo_avg_freq reports 524283 kHz instead of ~4723200 kHz while
> the CPU demonstrably runs at the boost frequency: a fixed workload
> completes in 1.72 s at the 4723200 kHz OPP versus 2.01 s at 4032000
> kHz, matching the 1.171 frequency ratio.
>
> Keep the arithmetic in 64 bits until after the shift.
>
> Fixes: 16d1e27475f6 ("arm64: Provide an AMU-based version of arch_freq_get_on_cpu")
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Keri <okerixx@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index d28438f8b83f..804758eeb63a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -245,8 +245,9 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> * (see amu_scale_freq_tick for details)
> */
> scale = arch_scale_freq_capacity(cpu);
> - freq = scale * arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
> - freq >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
> + scale *= arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
> + scale >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
Maybe just do it all one line?
freq = (scale * arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu)) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
I was going to suggest that you roll in the arch_scale_freq_capacity() as well
but then we'd need a cast to ensure maths was done in 64 bits and that was uglier.
I think this should end up the same as what you have.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> + freq = scale;
> return freq;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 16:37 [PATCH v1 0/2] arm64/cpufreq: report and track frequencies " Oleg Keri
2026-09-06 16:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] arm64: topology: fix arch_freq_get_on_cpu() overflow " Oleg Keri
2026-09-09 18:36 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-09-09 19:18 ` Oleg Keri
2026-09-06 16:37 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] cpufreq: update capacity_freq_ref when the boost state changes Oleg Keri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909113625.000063be@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=okerixx@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=ptsm@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®