Re: [PATCH RESEND wireless-next 00/18] wifi: Add Seamless Mobility Domain (SMD) AP support

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 22:27:52 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-09-08 at 13:20 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Ah, missed the skb extension. Obvious AI slop. Fun times.  
> 
> "Look Mom, I can push a button, I'm an engineer now!"
> 
> Do we have rules? I'm currently refusing to read anything that has an AI
> written commit message ... at the very least.
> 
> While I was on vacation the AI sloperators were arguing with each other
> on the wireless list:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260827074442.826644@enxio.de/
> 
> Can I ban those email addresses somehow?

We have a bot in nipa (mailbot.py) which follows the mailing list.
It can already update patchwork state.
I was thinking of adding support for bans there, something like 
 pv-bot: ban-1mo
and for a month the bot would respond "you have been banned, bla bla"
and auto-discard patches from patchwork.
That said I haven't gotten to the point of wanting to ban anyone yet.
Most of the "contributors" excrete 10+ patches in a day, then get bored
and disappear. Corporate slop may be more persistent tho, Qualcomm
employees must have gotten LLM access because we also saw slop from them
on netdev. TBH I see similar problems within Meta, tho. Random people
who can barely master Java now try to contribute upstream.
No idea what to do about all this.
One obvious thing, I guess, is that we should no longer feel obligated
to provide any meaningful feedback just because someone posted code.