mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Pal <kuncy7@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Jie Luo <jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Mieczyslaw Nalewaj <namiltd@yahoo.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Georg Seema <georgseema@gmail.com>,
	Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: keep the CMN block bus clocks enabled
Date: Wed,  9 Sep 2026 15:20:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909132049.37611-1-kuncy7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b58e3f64-1a5c-4db4-a51b-7138fb3609da@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 9/9/26 2:12 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Is it only the UNIPHY consuming the 50 MHz one?
>
> What consumes the XO clock? What consumes the sleep clock?

Nothing in Linux consumes any of the three today.

grep -rn '&cmn_pll' arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ on v6.18 gives, in full:

  ipq5018.dtsi:258:  assigned-clocks = <&cmn_pll IPQ5018_CMN_PLL_CLK>;
  ipq5424.dtsi:288:  assigned-clocks = <&cmn_pll IPQ5424_CMN_PLL_CLK>;
  ipq9574.dtsi:359:  assigned-clocks = <&cmn_pll CMN_PLL_CLK>;
  ipq9574.dtsi:1253:                   <&cmn_pll NSS_1200MHZ_CLK>,
  ipq9574.dtsi:1254:                   <&cmn_pll PPE_353MHZ_CLK>,

The first three are the provider setting its own VCO rate. The only
real consumer anywhere is the IPQ9574 NSS clock controller. No device
tree in the tree references XO_24MHZ_CLK or SLEEP_32KHZ_CLK, on any
SoC - and of the five compatibles the driver carries, only ipq5018,
ipq5424 and ipq9574 have a cmn_pll node in mainline at all.

On IPQ5018 specifically:

 - eth-50mhz: Jie is right that the UNIPHY takes it, and it will become
   a clk_get() consumer once IPQ5018 UNIPHY/PCS support lands. The node
   in the pending work has

	clocks = <&gcc GCC_UNIPHY_AHB_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_UNIPHY_SYS_CLK>,
		 <&gcc GCC_UNIPHY_RX_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_UNIPHY_TX_CLK>,
		 <&cmn_pll IPQ5018_ETH_50MHZ_CLK>;
	clock-names = "ahb", "sys", "port5_rx", "port5_tx", "ref";

   In mainline there is no such node yet - the only "uniphy" nodes on
   IPQ5018 are the two PCIe PHYs - so that 50 MHz path exists in
   silicon with nothing holding a handle on it from Linux.

 - xo-24mhz and sleep-32khz: I know of no consumer, in tree or out.
   Worth noting these are not what the rest of the SoC runs on: the
   platform's 24 MHz XO and 32 kHz sleep clock come from the board
   oscillators described separately in ipq5018.dtsi (xo_clk ->
   ref_96mhz_clk -> xo_board_clk, and sleep_clk), not from the CMN
   block. The CMN outputs at the same nominal rates look like
   re-exports for hard-wired internal use.

I would rather this did not decide the patch, though, because the
failure it fixes is not a later register access to the CMN block.
Mieczyslaw's summary in the v4 thread put it that way; the mechanism I
measured is narrower, and it is what the v4 commit message describes:

 - gating those same two clocks on an idle, fully booted GL-B3000
   (runtime PM autosuspend, gate landing ~75 s after probe) is
   harmless - runtime_status "suspended", both radios still serving
   clients;
 - with UNIPHY0 disabled in the device tree, so that no uniphy driver
   exists in that boot at all, the board still dies in 6 of 7 boots;
 - stretching the end of probe by 15 ms, or by a full 2 s, still ends
   in a watchdog reset, 8 of 8 boots each.

So what hangs the SoC is the gate transition landing amid early-boot
bus activity, not any consumer's access afterwards. That is also why
no consumer-side scheme can help: the window is between the CMN PLL
probe returning and the first clk_get() by anybody, whichever consumer
eventually turns up.

Thanks for the Ack on v4.

Best regards,
Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30 19:13 Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-02 20:53 ` Mieczyslaw Nalewaj
2026-08-03  7:14 ` Jie Luo
2026-08-03  9:10   ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-04 11:03     ` Jie Luo
2026-08-04 11:58       ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-05  4:52         ` Jie Luo
2026-08-05  8:12           ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-06  2:33             ` Jie Luo
2026-08-08 21:45               ` Mieczyslaw Nalewaj
2026-08-09 16:10                 ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-11 12:54                   ` Jie Luo
2026-08-11 19:53                     ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-19 13:00       ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-08-20  5:39         ` Jie Luo
2026-08-22 11:19           ` Mieczyslaw Nalewaj
2026-08-24 10:28             ` Jie Luo
2026-08-24 19:06               ` Mieczyslaw Nalewaj
2026-08-24 20:23               ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-09-09 12:12               ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-09-09 13:20                 ` Stanislaw Pal [this message]
2026-09-09 13:37                   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-09-11 14:18                     ` Jie Luo
2026-08-04 11:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-05 18:53   ` Mieczyslaw Nalewaj
2026-08-05 19:36   ` [PATCH v3] " Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-11 11:48     ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-13  9:33     ` [PATCH v4] " Stanislaw Pal
2026-09-08 10:57       ` Mieczyslaw Nalewaj
2026-09-09 12:10         ` Konrad Dybcio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909132049.37611-1-kuncy7@gmail.com \
    --to=kuncy7@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=georgseema@gmail.com \
    --cc=jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=namiltd@yahoo.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®