From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/sched: Introduce more locking to entity
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:59:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910075942.2000338-2-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
Changes since v2:
- Fix ordering bug between spsc_queue_pop() and
drm_sched_rq_pop_entity().
Changes since v1:
- Remove a bunch of patches; make this series only about locking
entity->last_scheduled. The rest shall be done in separate patches
and series. Consequently, also do not lock spsc_queue, yet.
- Move lock-cycle patch to first position. (Tvrtko)
Both Tvrtko [1] and I [2] have recently proposed some improvals for
drm_sched.
While taking Tvrtko's feedback into account for my patch, I realized
that both his and my patch can be fully replaced with a bigger and far
more beautiful series.
If I am not mistaken, it turns out that the entire entity->entity_idle
completion is also nothing but a workaround around the grave mistake of
not using the greatest helper with parallel programming that exists in
computer science: Locking.
This series adds locking to the last_scheduled field and all checks
related to detect the idleness of the entity. As before, the
job_scheduled event queue causes the periodic checks.
This way, we can get rid of memory barriers, RCU, a few lines of code,
make things more readable, understandable...
Greetings,
Philipp
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260611123423.39819-1-tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260626081942.2122144-2-phasta@kernel.org/
Philipp Stanner (3):
drm/sched: Lock drm_sched_rq_pop_entity() externally
drm/sched: Lock spsc_queue_pop() in drm_sched_entity_pop_job()
drm/sched: Protect entity->last_scheduled with spinlock
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 53 ++++++++++--------------
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_rq.c | 4 +-
include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 10 ++---
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 7:59 Philipp Stanner [this message]
2026-09-10 7:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/sched: Lock drm_sched_rq_pop_entity() externally Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10 7:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/sched: Lock spsc_queue_pop() in drm_sched_entity_pop_job() Philipp Stanner
2026-09-10 7:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/sched: Protect entity->last_scheduled with spinlock Philipp Stanner
2026-09-11 8:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-09-11 8:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/sched: Introduce more locking to entity Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-09-11 10:34 ` Philipp Stanner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910075942.2000338-2-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®