mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Guopeng Zhang" <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/7] cgroup/cpuset: Fix child invalidation after parent CPU changes
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:45:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910094546.5852-5-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910094546.5852-1-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>

From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>

compute_partition_effective_cpumask() recomputes a partition's exclusive
CPU mask before walking its children, but checks child containment against
cs->effective_xcpus. During an update, that field can still describe an
earlier point in the update, allowing a child outside the newly computed
mask to remain valid.

Use the newly computed exclusive mask for the containment check. Keep this
mask separate from the active-only effective mask because offline CPUs
remain part of the partition's CPU ownership.

After a child is invalidated, update_cpumasks_hier() can revisit it by
calling update_parent_effective_cpumask() with partcmd_update. The
invalid-partition recovery path is currently entered only when the child's
CPUs are already a subset of its parent's effective exclusive mask.
Otherwise part_error remains clear and the subsequent state transition
makes the child valid again. Enter the recovery path for every non-empty
CPU mask and report PERR_INVCPUS when the child is still outside the parent
mask.

The invalidation path also calls make_partition_invalid() without updating
isolated_cpus for the CPUs released by the child. Account each released CPU
according to its new owner. When the parent remains valid and owns the CPU,
use its partition state; otherwise use the state of the nearest valid
partition ancestor. Use the unfiltered exclusive mask so offline CPUs are
included in the accounting.

Fixes: 11e5f407b64a ("cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated partitions")
Fixes: 0c7f293efc87 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective for v2")
Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 7e8b167a29ed..7ba26b924086 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1281,6 +1281,17 @@ static bool isolated_cpu_update(int new_prs, int cpu)
 	return true;
 }
 
+/* Return the nearest valid partition ancestor of @cs. */
+static struct cpuset *partition_owner(struct cpuset *cs)
+{
+	struct cpuset *owner = parent_cs(cs);
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&cpuset_mutex);
+	while (!is_partition_valid(owner))
+		owner = parent_cs(owner);
+	return owner;
+}
+
 /*
  * isolated_cpus_update - Update the isolated_cpus mask
  * @old_prs: old partition_root_state
@@ -1976,12 +1987,16 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
 				adding = cpumask_and(tmp->addmask,
 						     cs->effective_xcpus,
 						     parent->effective_xcpus);
-		} else if (is_partition_invalid(cs) && !cpumask_empty(xcpus) &&
-			   cpumask_subset(xcpus, parent->effective_xcpus)) {
+		} else if (is_partition_invalid(cs) && !cpumask_empty(xcpus)) {
 			struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
 			struct cpuset *child;
 			bool exclusive = true;
 
+			if (!cpumask_subset(xcpus, parent->effective_xcpus)) {
+				part_error = PERR_INVCPUS;
+				goto write_error;
+			}
+
 			/*
 			 * Convert invalid partition to valid has to
 			 * pass the cpu exclusivity test.
@@ -2120,6 +2135,7 @@ cs_partition_error(struct cpuset *cs,
  * compute_partition_effective_cpumask - compute effective_cpus for partition
  * @cs: partition root cpuset
  * @new_ecpus: previously computed effective_cpus to be updated
+ * @new_xcpus: scratch mask for the new effective_xcpus
  *
  * Compute the effective_cpus of a partition root by scanning effective_xcpus
  * of child partition roots and excluding their effective_xcpus.
@@ -2133,7 +2149,8 @@ cs_partition_error(struct cpuset *cs,
  * Note that rcu_read_lock() is assumed to be held.
  */
 static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
-						struct cpumask *new_ecpus)
+						struct cpumask *new_ecpus,
+						struct cpumask *new_xcpus)
 {
 	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
 	struct cpuset *child;
@@ -2147,8 +2164,8 @@ static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
 	 *  2) All the effective_cpus will be used up and cp
 	 *     has tasks
 	 */
-	compute_excpus(cs, new_ecpus);
-	cpumask_and(new_ecpus, new_ecpus, cpu_active_mask);
+	compute_excpus(cs, new_xcpus);
+	cpumask_and(new_ecpus, new_xcpus, cpu_active_mask);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, cs) {
@@ -2162,17 +2179,31 @@ static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
 		 * partition root.
 		 */
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(is_remote_partition(child));
-		child_err = cs_partition_error(child, cs->effective_xcpus,
+		child_err = cs_partition_error(child, new_xcpus,
 					       new_ecpus, populated);
 		WRITE_ONCE(child->prs_err, child_err);
 
 		if (child_err) {
 			int old_prs = child->partition_root_state;
+			int parent_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
+			int owner_prs = partition_owner(cs)->partition_root_state;
+			int cpu;
 
 			/*
-			 * Invalidate child partition
+			 * Account each released CPU according to whether it is now
+			 * owned by the parent or by the partition that owns the parent.
 			 */
 			spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
+			for_each_cpu(cpu, child->effective_xcpus) {
+				int new_prs = parent_prs > 0 &&
+					      cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, new_xcpus)
+					      ? parent_prs : owner_prs;
+
+				if (old_prs == new_prs)
+					continue;
+				if (isolated_cpu_update(new_prs, cpu))
+					update_housekeeping = true;
+			}
 			make_partition_invalid(child);
 			spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
 			notify_partition_change(child, old_prs);
@@ -2274,7 +2305,7 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
 		}
 
 		if (remote || (is_partition_valid(parent) && is_partition_valid(cp)))
-			compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cp, tmp->new_cpus);
+			compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cp, tmp->new_cpus, tmp->addmask);
 		else
 			compute_effective_cpumask(tmp->new_cpus, cp, parent);
 
@@ -4111,7 +4142,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 	 */
 	remote = is_remote_partition(cs);
 	if (remote || (is_partition_valid(cs) && is_partition_valid(parent)))
-		compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cs, &new_cpus);
+		compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cs, &new_cpus, tmp->addmask);
 
 	if (remote && (cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus) ||
 			(cpumask_empty(&new_cpus) &&
@@ -4146,7 +4177,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 	if (partcmd >= 0) {
 		update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd, NULL, tmp);
 		if ((partcmd == partcmd_invalidate) || is_partition_valid(cs)) {
-			compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cs, &new_cpus);
+			compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cs, &new_cpus, tmp->addmask);
 			cpuset_force_rebuild();
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10  9:45 [PATCH v4 0/7] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition transitions and invalidation Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] cgroup/cpuset: Factor out child partition validation Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] cgroup/cpuset: Account for child CPU ownership in partition changes Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] cgroup/cpuset: Release CPUs when type-change validation fails Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-10  9:45 ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-09-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] cgroup/cpuset: Fix isolation accounting on propagated invalidation Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] cgroup/cpuset: Publish cpus_allowed before partition updates Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] cgroup/cpuset: Publish exclusive_cpus " Guopeng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260910094546.5852-5-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®