From: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>, Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: fix P-state index mismatch in extract_io()
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:13:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910111329.2220-2-lirongqing@baidu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910111329.2220-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>
From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
When policy->freq_table is built in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(), entries
that are not lower in frequency than the previous one are skipped.
For each remaining entry, freq_table[].driver_data stores the
original ACPI P-state index, so the index space of freq_table no
longer matches perf->states[].
extract_io() currently walks perf->states[] with index i and uses the
same i to index policy->freq_table[i]. When duplicate frequencies
exist, this can associate a P-state status with the frequency of a
different P-state. It can also access an invalid or sentinel entry in
freq_table when the number of entries in perf->states[] is greater than
the number of entries remaining in the frequency table.
extract_io() is used on ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO platforms by the
frequency verification path, which is enabled by the
acpi_pstate_strict module parameter. With the mismatched lookup,
check_freqs() can fail to match the frequency of the P-state that
drv_write() has already programmed. It then sleeps through all 100
iterations - at least ~1 ms of usleep_range() plus 100 cross-CPU
calls and I/O port reads, all with policy->rwsem held, and
.target_index() returns -EAGAIN, leaving perf->state at its previous
value while the hardware is running at the newly requested P-state.
The cpufreq core consequently keeps policy->cur at the old frequency.
Since __cpufreq_driver_target() returns early when the requested
frequency equals policy->cur, the driver is not called again for that
frequency and the control register is not rewritten. The hardware can
therefore remain at a frequency that differs from the frequency known
to the cpufreq core.
Fix this by iterating over policy->freq_table and using
pos->driver_data as the original ACPI P-state index when accessing
perf->states[], as extract_msr() already does.
Fixes: fe27cb358835 ("[CPUFREQ][2/8] acpi: reorganize code to make MSR support addition easier")
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 10ea603..a797bb2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -197,14 +197,13 @@ static unsigned extract_io(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u32 value)
{
struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
- int i;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
perf = to_perf_data(data);
- for (i = 0; i < perf->state_count; i++) {
- if (value == perf->states[i].status)
- return policy->freq_table[i].frequency;
- }
+ cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, policy->freq_table)
+ if (value == perf->states[pos->driver_data].status)
+ return pos->frequency;
return 0;
}
--
2.9.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 11:13 [PATCH v4 0/2] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: fix P-state index mismatch between perf->states[] and freq_table[] lirongqing
2026-09-10 11:13 ` lirongqing [this message]
2026-09-10 11:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: fix P-state index mismatch in get_cur_freq_on_cpu() lirongqing
2026-09-14 18:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-15 5:04 ` 答复: [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2026-09-17 18:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910111329.2220-2-lirongqing@baidu.com \
--to=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®