From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/15] coco: host: arm64: Coordinate peer stream waits during pdev communication
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:35:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910140509.868402-11-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910140509.868402-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
RMM stream operations can return RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_STREAM_WAIT while
one side waits for the peer stream to reach the matching point in the
protocol.
Teach arm-cca host device communication to detect STREAM_WAIT and add
a helper that runs pdev communication for both sides in parallel until
each side has made enough progress, then issue rmi_pdev_stream_complete().
This provides the synchronization needed for stream connect,
disconnect, key refresh, and key purge operations.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
---
drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h | 13 +++
include/linux/arm-smccc-rmi.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c
index a046edb6be86..784572116064 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c
+++ b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static inline gfp_t cache_obj_id_to_gfp_flags(u8 cache_obj_id)
return GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT;
}
-static int _do_dev_communicate(enum dev_comm_type type, struct pci_tsm *tsm)
+static int _do_dev_communicate(enum dev_comm_type type, struct pci_tsm *tsm, int *stream_wait)
{
unsigned long rmi_ret;
gfp_t cache_alloc_flags;
@@ -324,11 +324,17 @@ static int _do_dev_communicate(enum dev_comm_type type, struct pci_tsm *tsm)
if (pending_dev_communicate(io_exit))
goto redo_communicate;
+ if (io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_STREAM_WAIT) {
+ if (stream_wait)
+ *stream_wait = 1;
+ else
+ WARN(1, "Unexpected Stream wait status\n");
+ }
return 0;
}
static int do_dev_communicate(enum dev_comm_type type,
- struct pci_tsm *tsm, unsigned long error_state)
+ struct pci_tsm *tsm, unsigned long error_state, int *stream_wait)
{
int ret, state = error_state;
struct rmi_dev_comm_enter *io_enter;
@@ -337,8 +343,10 @@ static int do_dev_communicate(enum dev_comm_type type,
io_enter = &pdev_dsc->comm_data.io_params->enter;
io_enter->resp_len = 0;
io_enter->status = RMI_DEV_COMM_NONE;
+ if (stream_wait)
+ *stream_wait = 0;
- ret = _do_dev_communicate(type, tsm);
+ ret = _do_dev_communicate(type, tsm, stream_wait);
if (ret) {
if (type == PDEV_COMMUNICATE)
rmi_pdev_abort(virt_to_phys(pdev_dsc->rmm_pdev));
@@ -366,7 +374,7 @@ static int wait_for_dev_state(enum dev_comm_type type, struct pci_tsm *tsm,
int state;
do {
- state = do_dev_communicate(type, tsm, error_state);
+ state = do_dev_communicate(type, tsm, error_state, NULL);
if (state == target_state || state == error_state)
return state;
@@ -584,7 +592,7 @@ static void pdev_collect_identity_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
guard(mutex)(&pdev_dsc->object_lock);
- do_dev_communicate(PDEV_COMMUNICATE, tsm, RMI_PDEV_ERROR);
+ do_dev_communicate(PDEV_COMMUNICATE, tsm, RMI_PDEV_ERROR, NULL);
/*
* Don't worry about communication error. The caller will look at
@@ -703,3 +711,101 @@ void cca_pdev_stop_and_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
free_page((unsigned long)pdev_dsc->rmm_pdev);
pdev_dsc->rmm_pdev = NULL;
}
+
+static void stream_connect_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ int state;
+ int peer_wait = 0;
+ struct pci_tsm *tsm;
+ int my_index, peer_index, target;
+ struct stream_connect_work *stream_work;
+ struct cca_host_pdev_dsc *pdev_dsc;
+
+ stream_work = container_of(work, struct stream_connect_work, work);
+ tsm = stream_work->tsm;
+ pdev_dsc = to_cca_pdev_dsc(tsm->dsm_dev);
+
+ my_index = stream_work->my_index;
+ peer_index = my_index ^ 0x1;
+
+redo_communicate:
+ mutex_lock(&pdev_dsc->object_lock);
+
+ state = do_dev_communicate(PDEV_COMMUNICATE, tsm, RMI_PDEV_ERROR, &peer_wait);
+ if (state != RMI_PDEV_ERROR && peer_wait) {
+
+ if (!stream_work->has_peer) {
+ WARN(1, "Unexpected STREAM_WAIT without peer stream\n");
+ mutex_unlock(&pdev_dsc->object_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Record a fresh target val for this side, then wait until
+ * peer reaches at least the same target.
+ */
+ target = atomic_inc_return(&stream_work->sync->val[my_index]);
+
+ wake_up_all(&stream_work->sync->wq);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pdev_dsc->object_lock);
+
+ /* Wait for peer to make matching progress */
+ wait_event(stream_work->sync->wq,
+ atomic_read(&stream_work->sync->val[peer_index]) >= target);
+ goto redo_communicate;
+ }
+
+ /* Signal peer if it is waiting on me */
+ atomic_inc_return(&stream_work->sync->val[my_index]);
+ wake_up_all(&stream_work->sync->wq);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pdev_dsc->object_lock);
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused submit_stream_work(struct pci_dev *pdev1, struct pci_dev *pdev2,
+ unsigned long stream_handle)
+{
+ phys_addr_t rmm_pdev1_phys, rmm_pdev2_phys = 0;
+ struct cca_host_comm_data *comm_data_pdev1, *comm_data_pdev2;
+ struct cca_host_pdev_dsc *pdev_dsc1, *pdev_dsc2 = NULL;
+ struct stream_sync sync;
+ struct stream_connect_work stream_work_pdev1, stream_work_pdev2;
+
+ comm_data_pdev1 = to_cca_comm_data(pdev1);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&sync.wq);
+ atomic_set(&sync.val[0], 0);
+ atomic_set(&sync.val[1], 0);
+
+ pdev_dsc1 = to_cca_pdev_dsc(pdev1);
+ INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&stream_work_pdev1.work, stream_connect_workfn);
+ stream_work_pdev1.tsm = pdev1->tsm;
+ stream_work_pdev1.sync = &sync;
+ stream_work_pdev1.my_index = 0;
+ stream_work_pdev1.has_peer = !!pdev2;
+ queue_work(comm_data_pdev1->work_queue, &stream_work_pdev1.work);
+
+ if (pdev2) {
+ comm_data_pdev2 = to_cca_comm_data(pdev2);
+ pdev_dsc2 = to_cca_pdev_dsc(pdev2);
+ INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&stream_work_pdev2.work, stream_connect_workfn);
+ stream_work_pdev2.tsm = pdev2->tsm;
+ stream_work_pdev2.sync = &sync;
+ stream_work_pdev2.my_index = 1;
+ stream_work_pdev2.has_peer = true;
+ queue_work(comm_data_pdev2->work_queue, &stream_work_pdev2.work);
+ }
+
+ flush_work(&stream_work_pdev1.work);
+ if (pdev2) {
+ flush_work(&stream_work_pdev2.work);
+ destroy_work_on_stack(&stream_work_pdev2.work);
+ }
+
+ destroy_work_on_stack(&stream_work_pdev1.work);
+
+ rmm_pdev1_phys = virt_to_phys(pdev_dsc1->rmm_pdev);
+ if (pdev2)
+ rmm_pdev2_phys = virt_to_phys(pdev_dsc2->rmm_pdev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h
index dc5dc4246591..7b8fe0de7b90 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h
+++ b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h
@@ -27,6 +27,19 @@ struct dev_comm_work {
struct work_struct work;
};
+struct stream_sync {
+ wait_queue_head_t wq;
+ atomic_t val[2];
+};
+
+struct stream_connect_work {
+ struct pci_tsm *tsm;
+ struct work_struct work;
+ struct stream_sync *sync;
+ u8 my_index;
+ bool has_peer;
+};
+
struct cca_host_comm_data {
void *rsp_buff;
void *req_buff;
diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc-rmi.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc-rmi.h
index fdc830379060..1640f2f43344 100644
--- a/include/linux/arm-smccc-rmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc-rmi.h
@@ -540,6 +540,7 @@ struct rmi_pdev_params {
#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_WAIT BIT(3)
#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_RSP_RESET BIT(4)
#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_MULTI BIT(5)
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_STREAM_WAIT BIT(6)
#define RMI_DEV_COMM_NONE 0
#define RMI_DEV_COMM_RESPONSE 1
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 14:04 [PATCH v5 00/15] coco/TSM: Host-side Arm CCA IDE setup via connect/disconnect callbacks Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] coco: host: arm64: Prepare host TSM plumbing for IDE streams Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] coco: host: arm64: Create RMM pdev objects for PCI endpoints Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:04 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] coco: host: arm64: Add RMM pdev communication plumbing Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:04 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] coco: host: arm64: Add RMM pdev stop and destroy helper Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:04 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] X.509: Make certificate parser public Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:04 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] X.509: Parse Subject Alternative Name in certificates Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] X.509: Move certificate length retrieval into new helper Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] coco: host: arm64: Register device public key with RMM Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] coco: host: arm64: Initialize RMM pdev state for TDISP IDE connect Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) [this message]
2026-09-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] coco: host: arm64: Connect RMM pdev streams for IDE devices Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] coco: host: arm64: Refcount root-port pdevs used by IDE streams Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] PCI/TSM: Move CMA DOE mailbox discovery out of pci_tsm_pf0_constructor() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] coco: host: arm64: Add NCOH_SYS stream support for RC endpoints Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-10 14:05 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] coco: host: arm64: Enable PCI TSM connect callbacks Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910140509.868402-11-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®