From: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, urezki@gmail.com, harry@kernel.org
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, boqun@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, qiang.zhang@linux.dev, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] rcu: make userspace barrier hook drain kvfree_rcu work
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:00:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910170040.344864-2-matthias.goergens@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910170040.344864-1-matthias.goergens@gmail.com>
The bcachefs ktest allocation-leak check writes rcutree.do_rcu_barrier
before reading /proc/allocinfo. While testing bcachefs performance
changes, small objects released with kfree_rcu() remained visible after
repeated writes to the hook and 20 seconds of waiting, causing otherwise
clean tests to fail their leak check.
The test assumes a stronger contract than the hook currently documents:
rcu_barrier() waits for ordinary callbacks, but does not flush objects
still held in kfree_rcu() batching or per-CPU SLUB sheaves. The retained
population eventually fell as a sheaf filled; there is no evidence here
of unbounded growth or OOM.
Changing the hook to drain kvfree_rcu() work let the same unmodified
bcachefs workload pass its allocation check. All eight checkpoints in
one VM, after 50 through 400 option changes, reported zero retained
reconcile_scan objects. This motivated the separate private-cache
reproducer used to isolate the incomplete drain from bcachefs.
Calling kvfree_rcu_barrier() from rcu_barrier_throttled() was proposed
when the former API was added in 2024, to restore a clean baseline
between userspace benchmark runs. The discussion concluded that keeping
the existing hook name, adding the second operation and documenting both
was the safest compatibility choice, but the follow-up was not added.
Add that drain and document the stronger test interface. Keep the
explicit rcu_barrier() so the hook's ordinary-callback contract does not
depend on kvfree_rcu_barrier() reaching an ordinary barrier internally.
Do not reuse the ordinary rcu_barrier() sequence as an early-completion
check while throttling: an unrelated ordinary barrier does not establish
that kvfree_rcu() work was drained. Retain the existing start-rate limit.
Four fresh VM pairs with the full private-cache fixture retained the
queued object without the patch (60 to 60 active objects) and drained it
with the patch (60 to 59). A separate ordinary-callback regression test
passed on both kernels.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820155935.1167988-1-urezki@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@gmail.com>
---
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 7 ++---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 27 ++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 68647ff4bdd2..244a53166249 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -5699,9 +5699,10 @@ Kernel parameters
there is an ongoing too-long CSD-lock wait.
rcutree.do_rcu_barrier= [KNL]
- Request a call to rcu_barrier(). This is
- throttled so that userspace tests can safely
- hammer on the sysfs variable if they so choose.
+ Request that deferred kfree_rcu() objects and
+ ordinary call_rcu() callbacks be drained. This is
+ throttled so that userspace tests can safely hammer
+ on the sysfs variable if they so choose.
If triggered before the RCU grace-period machinery
is fully active, this will error out with EAGAIN.
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 96848fc1f02b..014e28ec3bd3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3989,12 +3989,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
static unsigned long rcu_barrier_last_throttle;
/**
- * rcu_barrier_throttled - Do rcu_barrier(), but limit to one per second
+ * rcu_barrier_throttled - Drain deferred RCU frees, but rate-limit starts
*
- * This can be thought of as guard rails around rcu_barrier() that
- * permits unrestricted userspace use, at least assuming the hardware's
- * try_cmpxchg() is robust. There will be at most one call per second to
- * rcu_barrier() system-wide from use of this function, which means that
+ * This can be thought of as guard rails around the deferred-free barriers
+ * that permit unrestricted userspace use, at least assuming the hardware's
+ * try_cmpxchg() is robust. There will be at most one drain operation started
+ * per sixteenth of a second from use of this function, which means that
* callers might needlessly wait a second or three.
*
* This is intended for use by test suites to avoid OOM by flushing RCU
@@ -4011,18 +4011,25 @@ static void rcu_barrier_throttled(void)
{
unsigned long j = jiffies;
unsigned long old = READ_ONCE(rcu_barrier_last_throttle);
- unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
while (time_in_range(j, old, old + HZ / 16) ||
!try_cmpxchg(&rcu_barrier_last_throttle, &old, j)) {
schedule_timeout_idle(HZ / 16);
- if (rcu_seq_done(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence, s)) {
- smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above check. */
- return;
- }
j = jiffies;
old = READ_ONCE(rcu_barrier_last_throttle);
}
+ /*
+ * kfree_rcu() can retain objects outside the ordinary callback lists in
+ * per-CPU SLUB sheaves and kvfree_rcu batches. Test suites use this hook
+ * to prevent deferred frees from spilling into the following test, so
+ * drain those queues as well as ordinary call_rcu() callbacks.
+ *
+ * kvfree_rcu_barrier() currently includes an ordinary barrier, but that
+ * is not part of its documented API. Keep the explicit rcu_barrier() so
+ * this hook's original contract does not depend on slab implementation
+ * details.
+ */
+ kvfree_rcu_barrier();
rcu_barrier();
}
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 10:11 [PATCH 0/1] rcu: drain kfree_rcu sheaves from the userspace barrier hook Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 12:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-09-10 13:46 ` Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 15:37 ` Harry Yoo
2026-09-10 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] rcu: make userspace barrier hook drain kvfree_rcu work Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 17:00 ` Matthias Goergens [this message]
2026-09-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-11 3:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Matthias Goergens
2026-09-11 3:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Matthias Goergens
2026-09-11 15:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910170040.344864-2-matthias.goergens@gmail.com \
--to=matthias.goergens@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®