From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D644BAA11; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789056562; cv=none; b=gRu2qX0BUicJAB53SNVomsSSSk2kSqDVossXTfw1s0oVKU3eDASGrNXnp+h0CW90uMCnAGR5zeh5cbo7OWF6+O0gLGgPIXFG5dXlMW6S7hjHNGr/IBlQEaME0U7WmbXCQXE44sIaw70USVrRhFCYekuNEKxrBTP4T2OvV1Gg/4Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789056562; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2U+ltwTMYXVi268fLCTmLLyzR8pRlBbwry1hESU4vmY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hsTSQqNvrpH8KWRMx7CXA/dlhuj6/KXZ/ILroh2lgP5RgBFPURmOjZrvcAh2GCf89TjuRR6qp5Y7k7rSchmq8Dv+yaBhsp/15l0BJzeq13v+17sNrh6RrIY2r6T2CGz3lAr7UnbqpNri4yfjWqxWQBAWCdmARwaPs+GbFgKFd54= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gjy0BHbI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gjy0BHbI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FBC81F000FF; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:09:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789056560; bh=whGOP8ry5KPgaWQs8fLSDE+EARpX6C5SukzqMWGdOzs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=gjy0BHbIvE9M4P14oFmxBamBCvnsFWxZoEcpHVoE4CtL8F9RC3OCsF64+AezugUfz D3Z3Cx/+Fs6zl8BpxFGxWJUuN56FTKSYkh01tbhhtPcp9fqTHohEhOtbzXF7WYQuvy FBajWDxYwAAp0WA5oI6S6Wm8PNkIAyZIJHUhpYkpk2/TB9YZ7GclIKxfnR3Il0A2Qj hF56nYWC2fLMMQdOYxb1R+0TENpbDumQjS7pVAc0QXPSNZc0uQrUcFK4SfjaOtaxWt 0hRgp9H3UK583qCTQMD1NA6TgcozPmPh4O8wosRNL1p+9GzK6f6oYv420bJ0fCP7UE +fnong2p8AB+g== Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:09:13 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= , David Laight , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleinxer , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , rodrigo.alencar@analog.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Use "er" asm constriant for add/sub Message-ID: <20260910170913.1a3ab4b2@jic23-hlaptop> In-Reply-To: <20260910034527.GBaqIn13O6zSuD4vak@fat_crate.local> References: <20260803163955.627bdd3f@pumpkin> <20260823233536.30b984ed@jic23-huawei> <20260901175101.1e059ac8@jic23-huawei> <20260907231444.7fa2d116@jic23-huawei> <20260908033216.GAap-BwAmBqoVDUbMK@fat_crate.local> <20260908152127.GCaqAn9zI09T7qvMhH@fat_crate.local> <20260908165501.GDaqA95YQKx_IL416d@fat_crate.local> <20260910042029.7c78f6dd@jic23-hlaptop> <20260910034527.GBaqIn13O6zSuD4vak@fat_crate.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 20:45:27 -0700 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 04:20:29AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > I've dropped the branch from IIO. That's fine because it was still being > > tested and hasn't gone out as non-rebasing yet. > > Ack, will do first thing tomorrow. > > > Next time I'll maybe find an IRC gateway and ping you on that. I can't > > find any reference to that being your preference in the kernel docs. > > Given you have a helpful page on tip, might be worth adding a note. > > I might of course be missing it. > > I'll send you a private note after this. > > > If it goes into a reasonably early rc, I'll just merge the relevant rc > > rather than needing an immutable. If next cycle, immutable please. > > First one can go to Linus now, second one would go next cycle. Do you want to > base ontop of both? Only need the first patch, so I'll just pick it up by merging an RC once it this is upstream. Thanks, Jonathan > > > I started out a bit grumpy that I had to hold a non trivial series for > > a cycle because of an x86 bug (having been very happy when David > > fixed it incredibly quickly!), that got reviewed then disappeared > > down a hole and didn't look like it would ever be seen again. > > Meh, got me on a belligerent day. > > No worries, happens to all of us. > > Thanks! >