From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] srcutree: Skip torture to-big transition for atomic SRCU
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 22:34:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202609102247.8X7GUWSj-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910041427.3579817-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Hi Kunwu,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on rcu/rcu/dev]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.3-rc2 next-20260909]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kunwu-Chan/srcutree-Skip-torture-to-big-transition-for-atomic-SRCU/20260910-121427
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rcu/linux.git rcu/dev
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260910041427.3579817-1-kunwu.chan%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] srcutree: Skip torture to-big transition for atomic SRCU
config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260910/202609102247.8X7GUWSj-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 24.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d3db069999553568848400c84cbf815c03f5470f)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260910/202609102247.8X7GUWSj-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609102247.8X7GUWSj-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:2080:61: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC'
2080 | if (SRCU_SIZING_IS_TORTURE() && ssp->srcu_reader_flavor != SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
vim +/SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC +2080 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
2031
2032 void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf)
2033 {
2034 int cpu;
2035 int idx;
2036 unsigned long s0 = 0, s1 = 0;
2037 int ss_state = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state);
2038 int ss_state_idx = ss_state;
2039
2040 idx = ssp->srcu_ctrp - &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0];
2041 if (ss_state < 0 || ss_state >= ARRAY_SIZE(srcu_size_state_name))
2042 ss_state_idx = ARRAY_SIZE(srcu_size_state_name) - 1;
2043 pr_alert("%s%s Tree SRCU g%ld state %d (%s)",
2044 tt, tf, rcu_seq_current(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq), ss_state,
2045 srcu_size_state_name[ss_state_idx]);
2046 if (!ssp->sda) {
2047 // Called after cleanup_srcu_struct(), perhaps.
2048 pr_cont(" No per-CPU srcu_data structures (->sda == NULL).\n");
2049 } else {
2050 pr_cont(" per-CPU(idx=%d):", idx);
2051 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
2052 unsigned long l0, l1;
2053 unsigned long u0, u1;
2054 long c0, c1;
2055 struct srcu_data *sdp;
2056
2057 sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu);
2058 u0 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[!idx].srcu_unlocks));
2059 u1 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_unlocks));
2060
2061 /*
2062 * Make sure that a lock is always counted if the corresponding
2063 * unlock is counted.
2064 */
2065 smp_rmb();
2066
2067 l0 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[!idx].srcu_locks));
2068 l1 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks));
2069
2070 c0 = l0 - u0;
2071 c1 = l1 - u1;
2072 pr_cont(" %d(%ld,%ld %c)",
2073 cpu, c0, c1,
2074 "C."[rcu_segcblist_empty(&sdp->srcu_cblist)]);
2075 s0 += c0;
2076 s1 += c1;
2077 }
2078 pr_cont(" T(%ld,%ld)\n", s0, s1);
2079 }
> 2080 if (SRCU_SIZING_IS_TORTURE() && ssp->srcu_reader_flavor != SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC)
2081 srcu_transition_to_big(ssp);
2082 }
2083 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_torture_stats_print);
2084
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 4:14 Kunwu Chan
2026-09-10 14:33 ` kernel test robot
2026-09-10 14:34 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-09-10 16:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-10 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-11 2:12 ` KunWu Chan
2026-09-11 4:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202609102247.8X7GUWSj-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®