mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>
Cc: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Steam Lin" <STLin2@winbond.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix quad-enable for flashes with QER bit in SR1
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:52:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911105245.408171F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911-perso-fix-spi-nor-qe-mxic-v2-1-70c324e9f30e@bootlin.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] spi_nor_read_sr1_and_sr2() leaves sr[1] uninitialized when read_sr2 is unsupported, leading to uninitialized stack memory use in callers and spurious -EIO errors.
--

commit d557e6d5e442dbe4ee4d997bc0f3bb6190d5ba2c
Author: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

mtd: spi-nor: Fix quad-enable for flashes with QER bit in SR1

Some flashes do set BFPT_DWORD15_QER_SR1_BIT6, which means they do not
have an SR2 to read from/write to. The generic QE helper has forgotten
about the Macronix case, which causes booting to fail. This fix makes
sure SR2 reads just return 0 if unsupported to accommodate this situation.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/178876719232.3543902.14451625037676421254.b4-ty@b4/T/#m5bc4ba6776436f2870ced0eb5789d229037ad840

> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index e2b6efafdd8d0..7bb197df5585b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -864,7 +865,10 @@ int spi_nor_read_sr1_and_sr2(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	return spi_nor_read_sr2(nor, &sr[1]);
> +	if (nor->params->opcodes.read_sr2)
> +		ret = spi_nor_read_sr2(nor, &sr[1]);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }

[Severity: High]
Does this code leave sr[1] uninitialized when read_sr2 is unsupported?

In spi_nor_write_sr1_and_sr2_and_check(), an uninitialized u8 tmp[2] is
passed to spi_nor_read_sr1_and_sr2():

drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c:spi_nor_write_sr1_and_sr2_and_check() {
	u8 tmp[2];
	...
	ret = spi_nor_read_sr1_and_sr2(nor, tmp);
	if (ret)
		return ret;

	if (sr[0] != tmp[0] || sr[1] != tmp[1])
		return -EIO;
	...
}

For chips without SR2, tmp[1] remains uninitialized stack garbage and the
comparison sr[1] != tmp[1] can evaluate to true, returning a spurious -EIO
error. This causes quad-enable and device probing to fail for the exact
flashes the patch is attempting to fix.

Also, does this affect spi_nor_otp_lock_sr2()?

drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c:spi_nor_otp_lock_sr2() {
	u8 sr[2];
	...
	ret = spi_nor_read_sr1_and_sr2(nor, sr);
	if (ret)
		return ret;

	/* no need to write the register if region is already locked */
	if (sr[1] & lock_bit)
		...
}

Here, sr[1] contains garbage, which is evaluated in the lock condition
check and potentially modified and written back to the device.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260911-perso-fix-spi-nor-qe-mxic-v2-1-70c324e9f30e@bootlin.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 10:42 Miquel Raynal
2026-09-11 10:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-11 12:45   ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-11 13:18     ` Michael Walle
2026-09-11 13:37       ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260911105245.408171F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=STLin2@winbond.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®