From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359DF5540A8 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789155485; cv=none; b=jc3wZLqmBMO7IGFkNiv7aLjcVdQe293tW/Yw3qpPEoLemTusO5elPkdBIDTevIEQhhCWixV7NrtMUUumlwdzXlIerg7Ghp33iyzpq9N6nUDeN9UnY/jE7GXp4eI+AHhSMKEfIsylM+jYL7DUJRgqLXvMu/sojcc6XGzJvMpWpj4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789155485; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fa/Qeb96oMIW5T8LspLwkD0jLNb+byEmUjzRFc7U9bE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TQXYnUCG3SLtjQpEtqapQPDqCay4/W8wpE+aUczTDrwBnJ3zf0WPOYUq5MUGdEB13iwF9PcRhFBJgqQsv28jujvXB+Yd4xhXE6Hb9TeozLtB9y6JzQc2r/bj50+fd0t+9pLu1jxr6Rrmga1WzWV8lrkClKfENI/0cXLDLXd+hF8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=cd7/P7f1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cd7/P7f1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1789155473; x=1820691473; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fa/Qeb96oMIW5T8LspLwkD0jLNb+byEmUjzRFc7U9bE=; b=cd7/P7f1EXAYV5slNasPo0F5Rk2+pzY54qChjT7cBeP9zF7rPvQjYZ1f YGG5ewt+Y8fbUt8xqJ4g8hEEaqX2LkN2gTuzbyt4rNPnZoQluexErZmjM v4/ltpxNHrcNpNNsk2sx4FZV7lI4fXTwRjgVLAAaQD0AhDwO1+otpYiuY CZWZgsrg+JqVLdYhnyg3ksAzbVZsJw6S75P6SI8l1dD6dVhepPIVBO+L0 ZjWrzvNmX0yI41jHx6tbnrTgCAuQAePPS1vN/kImbCPeLWPoIPjZ9v1q9 LLvXLOk0v7PlFlXP5uLLeDyqURq9ZwLE2qC6KYTXNRtiRP+/CfO3cocyp w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cvIeQgfQQmGGuFCplRaBjQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: VlD9YDqMRG+WOIt5siM4Eg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11902"; a="100219223" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,97,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="100219223" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2026 12:37:48 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Uk1sUkphTIm9x26Lc89Pow== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dLARZMgRQJKX3i/XqnpjcA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,97,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="270239988" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 0a3643a6ed9d) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2026 12:37:47 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 0a3643a6ed9d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x573w-0000000022v-24QR; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:37:37 +0000 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 03:36:50 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , John Ogness , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Use two irq_works instead per-CPU Message-ID: <202609120349.yDbrP6Tf-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260911103832.w6C8cT4L@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260911103832.w6C8cT4L@linutronix.de> Hi Sebastian, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v7.3-rc2 next-20260909] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sebastian-Andrzej-Siewior/printk-Use-two-irq_works-instead-per-CPU/20260911-123832 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260911103832.w6C8cT4L%40linutronix.de patch subject: [PATCH] printk: Use two irq_works instead per-CPU config: m68k-randconfig-r131-20260911 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260912/202609120349.yDbrP6Tf-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.5.0 sparse: v0.6.5-rc1 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260912/202609120349.yDbrP6Tf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609120349.yDbrP6Tf-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> kernel/printk/printk.c:4614:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pending_wakeup_work' was not declared. Should it be static? >> kernel/printk/printk.c:4615:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pending_output_work' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/pending_wakeup_work +4614 kernel/printk/printk.c 4613 > 4614 struct irq_work pending_wakeup_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_LAZY(pending_wake_fn); > 4615 struct irq_work pending_output_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_LAZY(pending_output_fn); 4616 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki