From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] kernfs: do less work under the kernfs_rwsem write lock
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:14:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260913021453.21507-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)
kernfs_rwsem is per kernfs root, so sysfs and cgroupfs have one each for
the whole machine, and every create, remove and rename takes it for
writing. Whatever a writer does while holding it, everyone else waits
for. These three patches take work out of that section.
Patch 1: kernfs_add_one() links the node in, drops the lock, then calls
kernfs_activate(), which takes it again. sysfs does not create nodes
deactivated, so it pays two write locks for every file and directory.
Activate before dropping the lock. lock_stat says 1200 -> 830 write
acquisitions for creating and destroying five dummy netdevs.
Patch 2: kernfs_rename_ns() calls kstrdup_const() under the lock. It is
the only GFP_KERNEL allocation under the write lock in kernfs, so a
rename can enter reclaim with the lock held. Allocate before the lock.
Patch 3: kernfs_rename_ns() also frees the old name under the lock with
kfree_rcu_mightsleep(). When its batching allocation fails, which is
what happens under memory pressure, it falls back to synchronize_rcu().
A rename can then wait out a grace period with the lock held. Free
after the unlock.
Tested with the kernfs selftests under KASAN and lockdep.
Shakeel Butt (3):
kernfs: activate a new node without dropping kernfs_rwsem
kernfs: allocate the new name outside kernfs_rwsem
kernfs: free the old name outside kernfs_rwsem
fs/kernfs/dir.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
base-commit: 7f24d0f60b1087dbc28d68398957c18774e5a7d8
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-13 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 2:14 Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-09-13 2:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernfs: activate a new node without dropping kernfs_rwsem Shakeel Butt
2026-09-13 2:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernfs: allocate the new name outside kernfs_rwsem Shakeel Butt
2026-09-13 2:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] kernfs: free the old " Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260913021453.21507-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®