mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] kernfs: do less work under the kernfs_rwsem write lock
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:14:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260913021453.21507-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)

kernfs_rwsem is per kernfs root, so sysfs and cgroupfs have one each for
the whole machine, and every create, remove and rename takes it for
writing.  Whatever a writer does while holding it, everyone else waits
for.  These three patches take work out of that section.

Patch 1: kernfs_add_one() links the node in, drops the lock, then calls
kernfs_activate(), which takes it again.  sysfs does not create nodes
deactivated, so it pays two write locks for every file and directory.
Activate before dropping the lock.  lock_stat says 1200 -> 830 write
acquisitions for creating and destroying five dummy netdevs.

Patch 2: kernfs_rename_ns() calls kstrdup_const() under the lock.  It is
the only GFP_KERNEL allocation under the write lock in kernfs, so a
rename can enter reclaim with the lock held.  Allocate before the lock.

Patch 3: kernfs_rename_ns() also frees the old name under the lock with
kfree_rcu_mightsleep().  When its batching allocation fails, which is
what happens under memory pressure, it falls back to synchronize_rcu().
A rename can then wait out a grace period with the lock held.  Free
after the unlock.

Tested with the kernfs selftests under KASAN and lockdep.

Shakeel Butt (3):
  kernfs: activate a new node without dropping kernfs_rwsem
  kernfs: allocate the new name outside kernfs_rwsem
  kernfs: free the old name outside kernfs_rwsem

 fs/kernfs/dir.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


base-commit: 7f24d0f60b1087dbc28d68398957c18774e5a7d8
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-13  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-13  2:14 Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-09-13  2:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernfs: activate a new node without dropping kernfs_rwsem Shakeel Butt
2026-09-13  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernfs: allocate the new name outside kernfs_rwsem Shakeel Butt
2026-09-13  2:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] kernfs: free the old " Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260913021453.21507-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®