mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: pratyush@kernel.org, mwalle@kernel.org,
	"Itai Handler" <itai.handler@gmail.com>
Cc: takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	vigneshr@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	richard@nod.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: fix the lock left held by spi_nor_rww_start_exclusive()
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:22:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914082214.E53281F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914081149.1916589-2-itai.handler@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing spi_nor_unprep() on error path when wait_event_killable() fails in spi_nor_prep_and_lock() and its variants.
--

commit c817801772cd87c9d5fe101e67f14bf0d06c97df
Author: Itai Handler <itai.handler@gmail.com>
Subject: mtd: spi-nor: fix the lock left held by spi_nor_rww_start_exclusive()

This commit changes spi_nor_rww_start_exclusive() to use scope-based
mutex cleanup helpers instead of manually locking without unlocking.
This fixes a deadlock and allows operations to proceed when the flash
is busy by ensuring the mutex is released upon returning.

> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index ccf4396cdcd04..8bc117b46e028 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ static bool spi_nor_rww_start_exclusive(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  {
>  	struct spi_nor_rww *rww = &nor->rww;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&nor->lock);
> +	guard(mutex)(&nor->lock);
>  
>  	if (rww->ongoing_io || rww->ongoing_rd || rww->ongoing_pe)
>  		return false;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing the wait condition here,
I noticed a missing cleanup path in spi_nor_prep_and_lock() and its program,
erase, and read variants.

Looking at spi_nor_prep_and_lock() in drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c, it starts
by calling spi_nor_prep() which acquires resources like a hardware mutex and
clock. When parallel locking is enabled, it calls wait_event_killable():

drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c:spi_nor_prep_and_lock() {
    ...
	ret = spi_nor_prep(nor);
	if (ret)
		return ret;

	if (!spi_nor_use_parallel_locking(nor))
		mutex_lock(&nor->lock);
	else
		ret = wait_event_killable(nor->rww.wait,
					  spi_nor_rww_start_exclusive(nor));

	return ret;
}

If wait_event_killable() is interrupted by a fatal signal, it returns
-ERESTARTSYS. Does this directly return the error and skip spi_nor_unprep()?

Since the controller's .prepare hook acquires hardware resources, would
returning directly here cause a permanent deadlock on the next access and a
resource leak?

Userspace triggering I/O on an RWW flash can be signaled while waiting for
ongoing I/O to finish, so this error path seems reachable. 

Does this same pattern appear in spi_nor_prep_and_lock_pe() using
spi_nor_rww_start_pe() and in spi_nor_prep_and_lock_rd() using
spi_nor_rww_start_rd()?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260914081149.1916589-1-itai.handler@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14  8:11 [PATCH v2 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: fix the unlocked restore on shutdown and remove Itai Handler
2026-09-14  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: fix the lock left held by spi_nor_rww_start_exclusive() Itai Handler
2026-09-14  8:22   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-14  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: take the flash lock in spi_nor_shutdown() Itai Handler
2026-09-14  8:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: take the flash lock in spi_nor_remove() Itai Handler
2026-09-14  8:26   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260914082214.E53281F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=itai.handler@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®