From: Uzair Beg <uzairbeg11@gmail.com>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, asml.silence@gmail.com,
Chengfeng Lin <lin2530632123@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Uzair Beg <uzairbeg11@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] io_uring/rsrc: prefill the node cache when a file table is registered empty
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:20:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914092049.130079-4-uzairbeg11@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914092049.130079-1-uzairbeg11@gmail.com>
Registering a sparse fixed file table allocates no nodes at
registration time; each node is allocated later, on the install path,
where MSG_RING SEND_FD pays for it. Bare-metal measurement of the
4,096-slot first fill shows the cost is not the allocator call
(bulk refill was neutral) nor fresh slab pages (priming the slab was
neutral), but the per-object SLUB allocation path itself. The only way
to take it off the install path is to not allocate there.
When a sparse table of N slots is registered, grow the per-ring node
cache to min(N, IO_ALLOC_CACHE_PREFILL_MAX) and bulk-fill it, so the
subsequent installs hit the cache. Prefill is best-effort: on any
failure the cache is left in a valid state (a successfully grown
pointer array is retained) and registration proceeds unchanged.
Non-sparse registrations are untouched, since they allocate every node
inline anyway.
On the reported 4,096-slot first fill this is 9.8% faster than
unpatched. Because the enlarged cache also retains nodes released by
FILES_UPDATE, a same-ring remove-and-refill of 4,096 files is 18.8%
faster. The cost is moved to registration rather than removed: a
one-shot register-then-fill is unchanged overall, and a program that
registers many slots and installs few pays for nodes it never uses.
Whether that trade is acceptable, or should be behind a registration
flag, is the question this patch is intended to raise.
The stash loop from the bulk refill path is factored into a helper so
both callers share it.
Reported-by: Chengfeng Lin <lin2530632123@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/CANGjgdmt0FQ=offsdfn+wEaDxbOFoAa6bi92X_vEo4S6aCZ56A@mail.gmail.com/
Tested-by: Chengfeng Lin <lin2530632123@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Chengfeng Lin <lin2530632123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Lin <lin2530632123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uzair Beg <uzairbeg11@gmail.com>
---
io_uring/alloc_cache.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
io_uring/alloc_cache.h | 2 ++
io_uring/rsrc.c | 4 +++
3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/alloc_cache.c b/io_uring/alloc_cache.c
index cba0e6c5d66..2c6e09313d2 100644
--- a/io_uring/alloc_cache.c
+++ b/io_uring/alloc_cache.c
@@ -38,6 +38,22 @@ bool io_alloc_cache_init(struct io_alloc_cache *cache,
return false;
}
+static void io_cache_stash(struct io_alloc_cache *cache, void **slot,
+ unsigned int nr)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
+ if (cache->init_clear)
+ memset(slot[i], 0, cache->init_clear);
+ if (unlikely(!kasan_mempool_poison_object(slot[i])))
+ break;
+ cache->nr_cached++;
+ }
+ for (; i < nr; i++)
+ kmem_cache_free(cache->slab, slot[i]);
+}
+
void *io_cache_alloc_new(struct io_alloc_cache *cache, gfp_t gfp)
{
void *obj;
@@ -45,7 +61,7 @@ void *io_cache_alloc_new(struct io_alloc_cache *cache, gfp_t gfp)
if (cache->slab) {
unsigned int room = cache->max_cached - cache->nr_cached;
void **slot = &cache->entries[cache->nr_cached];
- unsigned int batch, got, i;
+ unsigned int batch, got;
if (unlikely(!room))
return kmem_cache_alloc(cache->slab, gfp);
@@ -57,15 +73,7 @@ void *io_cache_alloc_new(struct io_alloc_cache *cache, gfp_t gfp)
/* return one object, stash the rest in the cache */
obj = slot[got - 1];
- for (i = 0; i < got - 1; i++) {
- if (cache->init_clear)
- memset(slot[i], 0, cache->init_clear);
- if (unlikely(!kasan_mempool_poison_object(slot[i])))
- break;
- cache->nr_cached++;
- }
- for (; i < got - 1; i++)
- kmem_cache_free(cache->slab, slot[i]);
+ io_cache_stash(cache, slot, got - 1);
} else {
obj = kmalloc(cache->elem_size, gfp);
}
@@ -73,3 +81,33 @@ void *io_cache_alloc_new(struct io_alloc_cache *cache, gfp_t gfp)
memset(obj, 0, cache->init_clear);
return obj;
}
+
+void io_alloc_cache_prefill(struct io_alloc_cache *cache, unsigned int nr)
+{
+ gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;
+ unsigned int got;
+ void **entries;
+
+ if (!cache->slab || !cache->entries)
+ return;
+
+ nr = min_t(unsigned int, nr, IO_ALLOC_CACHE_PREFILL_MAX);
+ if (nr <= cache->nr_cached)
+ return;
+
+ if (nr > cache->max_cached) {
+ entries = kvmalloc_array(nr, sizeof(void *), gfp);
+ if (!entries)
+ return;
+ memcpy(entries, cache->entries,
+ cache->nr_cached * sizeof(void *));
+ kvfree(cache->entries);
+ cache->entries = entries;
+ cache->max_cached = nr;
+ }
+
+ got = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(cache->slab, gfp, nr - cache->nr_cached,
+ &cache->entries[cache->nr_cached]);
+ if (got)
+ io_cache_stash(cache, &cache->entries[cache->nr_cached], got);
+}
diff --git a/io_uring/alloc_cache.h b/io_uring/alloc_cache.h
index 82d552c7517..ca6af52dd7d 100644
--- a/io_uring/alloc_cache.h
+++ b/io_uring/alloc_cache.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
*/
#define IO_ALLOC_CACHE_MAX 128
#define IO_ALLOC_CACHE_REFILL 32
+#define IO_ALLOC_CACHE_PREFILL_MAX 4096
void io_alloc_cache_free(struct io_alloc_cache *cache,
void (*free)(const void *));
@@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ bool io_alloc_cache_init(struct io_alloc_cache *cache,
unsigned int init_bytes);
void *io_cache_alloc_new(struct io_alloc_cache *cache, gfp_t gfp);
+void io_alloc_cache_prefill(struct io_alloc_cache *cache, unsigned int nr);
static inline bool io_alloc_cache_put(struct io_alloc_cache *cache,
void *entry)
diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
index 6413682ebe4..b7f78b6b514 100644
--- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
+++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
@@ -560,6 +560,10 @@ int io_sqe_files_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
if (!io_alloc_file_tables(ctx, &ctx->file_table, nr_args))
return -ENOMEM;
+ /* sparse table: nodes are installed later, so cache them now */
+ if (!fds)
+ io_alloc_cache_prefill(&ctx->node_cache, nr_args);
+
for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
struct io_rsrc_node *node;
u64 tag = 0;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 9:20 [RFC PATCH 0/3] io_uring/rsrc: reduce node allocation cost on sparse file table installs Uzair Beg
2026-09-14 9:20 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] io_uring/rsrc: allocate io_rsrc_node from a dedicated kmem_cache Uzair Beg
2026-09-15 17:54 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-09-14 9:20 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] io_uring/rsrc: bulk refill the node cache on allocation miss Uzair Beg
2026-09-14 9:20 ` Uzair Beg [this message]
2026-09-15 18:20 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] io_uring/rsrc: prefill the node cache when a file table is registered empty Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914092049.130079-4-uzairbeg11@gmail.com \
--to=uzairbeg11@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lin2530632123@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®