mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Move RSI support out of arch/arm64
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:45:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914134559.00004e1b@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914060511.277948-4-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>

On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:35:07 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> wrote:

> The RSI SMCCC function IDs describe a firmware ABI and are not arm64
> architecture specific definitions. Follow-up changes need to use them from
> non-arch code, including drivers/firmware/smccc and the Arm CCA guest
> driver.
> 
> Move the complete Realm Service Interface (RSI) implementation from
> arch/arm64 to drivers/firmware/arm_rmm. The RSI SMCCC definitions and
> command helpers are also moved to include/linux so they can be shared by
> architecture code and firmware or driver code. This also keeps the
> firmware interface outside architecture code, as requested [1].
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/agsNO9cc7H-b0H8L@willie-the-truck
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>

Moving the code makes sense and indeed that is what the patch does so
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>

Trivial gripe about the original code inline.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h b/include/linux/arm-rsi-cmds.h
> similarity index 69%
> rename from arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h
> rename to include/linux/arm-rsi-cmds.h
> index c1fab41f671e..9e8a8c189ca1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-rsi-cmds.h

>  
> +static inline int rsi_set_memory_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
> +				       enum ripas state, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	unsigned long ret;
> +	phys_addr_t top;
> +
> +	while (start != end) {
> +		ret = rsi_set_addr_range_state(start, end, state, flags, &top);
> +		if (ret || top < start || top > end)

Obviously this is just code movement, but why eat the error value that
rsi_set_addr_range_state() returns? 

> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		start = top;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}




  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14  6:05 [PATCH v11 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-14  6:05 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] firmware: smccc: Add an Arm " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-14 13:03   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-14 20:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-14  6:05 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] firmware: hwrng: arm_smccc_trng: Register as an SMCCC device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-14 13:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-14 20:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-14  6:05 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Move RSI support out of arch/arm64 Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-14 13:18   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-14 20:45   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-09-14  6:05 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] arm64: realm: Move Realm memory encryption ops to RSI code Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-14 13:20   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-14 14:50     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-14  6:05 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] virt: coco: arm-cca-guest: Rename TSM report source file Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-14 13:23   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-14 15:06   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-14 20:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-14  6:05 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] firmware: smccc: arm-cca-guest: Bind the TSM provider to an SMCCC device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-14 13:42   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-14 20:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-14  6:05 ` [PATCH v11 7/7] coco: guest: arm64: Replace dummy CCA device with sysfs ABI Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-14 13:48   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-14 21:00   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260914134559.00004e1b@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®