From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA16F2D73A0; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 23:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789429772; cv=none; b=nxWBumC9Y6ia7bi+/yRLAKGyVyZBCYYX6ls+EHJz3G5fY4cPnP0kQxOUHUSEQQH5DQRzyS5AVV6/Yht7o7LRV8k2q3A+V34t+7EW3wL8JiSH8Hn5ZCVWT33stuWTnxQRm3lpLPwVHwjHYXXuWwQJ9fZatlyVArH0/0STiSri+Ws= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789429772; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZCT9nC32PC7LaY+hyGN3uSHNHOg82g2U4I9ApLLyFPU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=AMl7fLJFGBi9ueTFZPUpj9GllbdY4nDT2h+K148suiTrfOdj/ac8g+WTNDbv1l/yd6XtXxlmSr3IHqmDKgoFktKgkPycn7p6eSKFWzAw1lfd/D1fefWwD5+Rss3XzAP9IPECZKkINzO2eySnXEVLblWCIjz+S9E/8eZQZqfN2io= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aN2H49zm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aN2H49zm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DE181F000FF; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 23:49:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789429771; bh=qseDGL6DGTE6ag7V6hK0YAZQ8hJbvq3vxBHJNlYWSsc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=aN2H49zmND70doM4Uq/R1eHAz406bNkb1X77f9LZfStN6GJzJnawesoh6UpZxM6Am NdsR3vpEyR4tHZ0QSsQloS1sX2Hlxi0rDv0mr2WZGWWZLAD2xzWoIoQCbuZBfO6RbT +qrHjF3mCOh7qPYMXe2KXr87SQab3GHa36yhfAKSnkLKp+sss80SbMKDIF8L9AZjCs 71OMjj9EnxnT3eXQBN4ug2ztHxwqdXcD7gyUjop26I0HcRdxPTAbgPG/Xp5ElvQMHQ gJfQnAL/5jRgLQSUB9hQ74/RU/iMHF+5PftAmwAEAKl5AxhcCzQQ3qH4VvWVlfoWf2 xlz+LASXH8DXg== From: SJ Park To: Kunwu Chan Cc: SJ Park , Andrew Morton , Brendan Higgins , David Gow , damon@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] mm/damon/core-kunit: test invalid damos filter commits Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 16:49:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20260914234924.100335-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260914155729.1518105-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Kunwu, On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 23:57:27 +0800 Kunwu Chan wrote: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:18:06 -0700 SJ Park wrote: > > > Add test cases for testing the validation of damos filter arguments in > > commit time. [...] > Could we also test an invalid PROBE_HITS_WSUM range here? > > Patch 4 adds the same max < min validation for > DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_PROBE_HITS_WSUM, but this test only covers > ADDR and HUGEPAGE_SIZE. I agree it is better to add a test. But not necessarily together with this series, in my humble opinion. I am separately working on the test. Thanks, SJ [...]