From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F7A40802F; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789442771; cv=none; b=GIva1Eg5pxvDmeZ/gsxFd5uTRU4P+d7Dyh6kpRhYSQKfts6tIFvv35hBysHOJSjRgw0BdWYFbPaHe/kjTpyxeAR1yZ6Pr2rXNp2Wqiz7g9Z/ZLJY/tNjl0U690hM+HZ7gGwuXgqyIEPbEuajGwFT37tzlZCzy4YR3ZZRS9n1so0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789442771; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/fmdiimriYiJUuAsrtFECO434CstEhP8JLQH9A3VZck=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=JBGYt5hlHknF4+QJIJggdfbWlVCaHbPaLn7vHNetMYpdXoP/hKtlsk6ugs/BJ5VgRYd42tUHUV/v9l62w1aBxco4E+Oyp9DWmGnIWxwRsZyatLPuOV16oyGGUUoy2okPSmiHlT5d/tI0gimKoOzgZsNtm7gJQHzenkVe4Ebj+D4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Av7kjRuf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Av7kjRuf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AB881F008A0; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:26:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789442766; bh=/fmdiimriYiJUuAsrtFECO434CstEhP8JLQH9A3VZck=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Av7kjRufsggVudr+71MAZZ8myv2HDvbcuMT0tzC6UcCAANnaoqOtkj/VwrMAV25Tv Ez5zbuXg4eBnq4EgJtGBaC7wkXbIc1VJ41clM3GZax/Nclj+o2PkWrYVeRv/Xb5Tv/ pSIheOVdn7Meoz1YscIwHMI3dW0+X2F00wHDZBAPYL/NVkl2M8kXuMfH16XCygrWfI HqYQZWbtFg1GVunzhZ2b/6n0b3tGwUNYZnl8NrXHzpXu0b8J/7aCJovx1gwegB3cem Jm+B/k170WsoqFIL1D331KitUj/v9OIRlDAfRND6TimufZYOe2Z1+5qinCM/bxX60c q2/IZ+4Yu+RcA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] notifier: assert static storage for locking notifier heads Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Yury Norov" Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Eugenio Perez" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20260915031334.1194975-10-ynorov@nvidia.com> References: <20260915030336.1192299-1-ynorov@nvidia.com> <20260915031334.1194975-10-ynorov@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:26:05 +0000 Message-Id: <20260915032606.0AB881F008A0@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Atomic, blocking and SRCU notifier head declarations statically initialize > locks or SRCU state that require persistent lockdep class keys. >=20 > Apply ASSERT_STATIC_STORAGE() to ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(), > BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD() and the common _SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD() wrapper, > including both Tree SRCU and Tiny SRCU variants. Leave RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD() > unchanged because it has no such initialization requirement. >=20 > Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260915030336.1192= 299-1-ynorov@nvidia.com?part=3D15