From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A79C41A574; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789487683; cv=none; b=S3CfnH0eJGVtqGOpOAC1Vtg7pzLfC4Uyt4Ok6JA81r9/dDNwVP2RoYUyA1p3pnWpdCNMZmgqtg/m5J57q32a9vYozWDqak9vAY4sStocmzyOKxF0n/9aM1l0asyaOXv21iMyEV168u5+rJdvB+7p7F4yc1cryFjGUd7ZarwS68A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789487683; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WaeE+NSg9/0bGJcOBZhmrICzPz1mWGmKuF80sJgwbh4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lCuhyDYQdhHos9TQuktBrJMtBg6dXF+Iv/PyKMTljH1PbCCOVFGu+SK1w7082+z0Ws83JQ5Eo+U4I9u3D3YPq8heislMJAtEcZvaDhRnZDCad9/B/Zhq+rY02IvvunwON74C+vmZqweEXzHOFW2xqyn1hQTfMLruf/1Usw7JJvE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Mwu67oTG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Mwu67oTG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C37BD1F000FF; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:54:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789487682; bh=WaeE+NSg9/0bGJcOBZhmrICzPz1mWGmKuF80sJgwbh4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Mwu67oTGvqcGQJf6Y6axLXY0b1Ndd5AX0PuU1dsJ5j4wusamnmrcE8SnRkCHiX/ts oAUqpQdYsNOLSKbCNLIM2oU1dgO3k/jb8SPr/LSNFGdR9VTsejxVFiMMSMMII7bUIo Df1ZUbr+Zbbxpl7h06I9VzbFvmDMIqWsv/84erv9zCh8mgqFgu0XcPO+xtxW8bjBJB PbuhMqece235IDXkals0n6uTwIfYuJJCYwKWJVcx/FcdHw1Ro0Wg/t1g2bq007pp8E XuyiAAm4rPXLzvgnYAFe7k6k5mnG2mX1cyEqvmwkY90RxElZluu48VPqYyl1TGKTfX K3GKNsxKOn6qg== Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:54:41 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: tmbates12 Cc: Donald Hunter , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Jiri Pirko , Stanislav Fomichev , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] netlink: fix ynl spec tooling robustness bugs Message-ID: <20260915085441.67bc0d4b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260908-ynl-robustness-v1-0-f255214c0f30@gmail.com> <20260910192314.209ecb01@kernel.org> <20260914161206.40a049ed@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 21:46:09 -0400 tmbates12 wrote: > I'd assume that starting the bridge spec out as an RFC would be appropriate > while we see how much work it'll take, but I'd just like to confirm beforehand. RFC or PATCH doesn't really matter here. RFC sounds fine