From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: markdamirkan@gmail.com
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: net: add RPL SRH loop test
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 18:27:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260915152734.GB723831@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911-sympwn-rpl-send-v1-2-1753993bb584@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 04:11:22PM -0700, Mark Amirkan via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Mark Amirkan <markdamirkan@gmail.com>
>
> Add two local addresses to a network namespace and exercise RPL route
> validation. Verify that adjacent local addresses remain valid, while a
> non-local address between them causes the route to be rejected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Amirkan <markdamirkan@gmail.com>
> Assisted-by: Symbolic
Thanks for the test. Same comment as before regarding the tag.
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/net/rpl_srh_loop.sh | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> index 3ee3378f8b26..7fe7e38b9c6c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ TEST_PROGS := \
> reuseport_addr_any.sh \
> route_hint.sh \
> route_localnet.sh \
> + rpl_srh_loop.sh \
> rps_default_mask.sh \
> rtnetlink.py \
> rtnetlink.sh \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rpl_srh_loop.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rpl_srh_loop.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..a2e9991d789d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rpl_srh_loop.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +source lib.sh
> +
> +cleanup()
> +{
> + cleanup_ns "$NS"
> +}
> +
> +trap cleanup EXIT
This can be:
trap 'cleanup_ns $NS' EXIT
> +
> +require_command ip
> +setup_ns NS || exit $?
> +
> +ip -n "$NS" -6 address add 2001:db8:1::1/128 dev lo nodad
> +ip -n "$NS" -6 address add 2001:db8:3::1/128 dev lo nodad
> +
> +if ! ip -n "$NS" -6 route add 2001:db8:10::/64 \
> + encap rpl segs 2001:db8:4::1 dev lo 2>/dev/null; then
> + echo "SKIP: RPL lightweight tunnel support not available"
> + exit $ksft_skip
> +fi
This can be removed. rpl is present in iproute2 since 2020 and
CONFIG_IPV6_RPL_LWTUNNEL=y is present in tools/testing/selftests/net/config
> +
> +RET=0
> +ip -n "$NS" -6 route add 2001:db8:11::/64 \
> + encap rpl segs 2001:db8:1::1,2001:db8:3::1 dev lo
> +check_err $? "Adjacent local addresses were rejected"
> +log_test "RPL accepts adjacent local addresses"
> +
> +RET=0
> +ip -n "$NS" -6 route add 2001:db8:12::/64 \
> + encap rpl segs 2001:db8:1::1,2001:db8:2::1,2001:db8:3::1 dev lo \
> + 2>/dev/null
> +check_fail $? "Separated local addresses were accepted"
> +log_test "RPL rejects separated local addresses"
> +
> +exit $EXIT_STATUS
Should be:
exit "$EXIT_STATUS"
Please run shellcheck. Preferably via ingest_mdir.py:
https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa#running-locally
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 23:11 [PATCH net 0/2] ipv6: rpl: fix loop detection for separated local addresses Mark Amirkan via B4 Relay
2026-09-11 23:11 ` [PATCH net 1/2] " Mark Amirkan via B4 Relay
2026-09-15 15:27 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-09-11 23:11 ` [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: net: add RPL SRH loop test Mark Amirkan via B4 Relay
2026-09-15 15:27 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-09-15 23:43 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260915152734.GB723831@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markdamirkan@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®