From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Ramesh Errabolu <ramesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Tobias Schumacher <ts@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] s390/pci: Fix some zpci_report_status() issues
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:14:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916-fix_zpci_report_status_pdev_leak-v3-0-61a2f980e71d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi All,
This series fixes four issues found in zpci_report_status().
* A missing pci_dev_put() (patch 1)
* Dropping the device lock too early (patch 2)
* Missing an error report when there is no associated pdev (patch 3)
* An inconsistent error report when skipping recovery on permanent
failure (patch 4)
Thanks,
Niklas
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Change in approach, pass the pdev as a parameter
- Add a device lock assertion and extract a helper function for pdev
specific status
- Also report the status if no pdev is associated
- Fix an inconsistent report when recovery is skipped due to permanent
failure
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260819-fix_zpci_report_status_pdev_leak-v2-0-da0c4aa7c0ca@linux.ibm.com
Changes in v2:
- Added a second fix to address Sashiko's finding of having
to hold the device lock during the call to zpci_report_status()
- Add R-bs from Matthew and Farhan
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260818-fix_zpci_report_status_pdev_leak-v1-1-576520f4d068@linux.ibm.com
---
Niklas Schnelle (4):
s390/pci: Fix leak of struct pci_dev reference in zpci_report_status()
s390/pci: Fix missing device lock in zpci_report_status()
s390/pci: Report SCLP status on error events when no pdev is associated
s390/pci: Don't report recovery success on skipped recovery
arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c | 7 +++++--
arch/s390/pci/pci_report.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
arch/s390/pci/pci_report.h | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: fd73f4a6659897191fa0d40695fe370925dd3780
change-id: 20260817-fix_zpci_report_status_pdev_leak-1b101c1fe021
Best regards,
--
Niklas Schnelle
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 15:14 Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2026-09-16 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] s390/pci: Fix leak of struct pci_dev reference in zpci_report_status() Niklas Schnelle
2026-09-17 17:51 ` Farhan Ali
2026-09-18 8:17 ` Benjamin Block
2026-09-18 8:19 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-09-18 8:20 ` Benjamin Block
2026-09-18 8:37 ` Benjamin Block
2026-09-16 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] s390/pci: Fix missing device lock " Niklas Schnelle
2026-09-17 17:52 ` Farhan Ali
2026-09-18 8:26 ` Benjamin Block
2026-09-16 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] s390/pci: Report SCLP status on error events when no pdev is associated Niklas Schnelle
2026-09-17 18:06 ` Farhan Ali
2026-09-18 8:32 ` Benjamin Block
2026-09-16 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] s390/pci: Don't report recovery success on skipped recovery Niklas Schnelle
2026-09-17 18:08 ` Farhan Ali
2026-09-18 8:34 ` Benjamin Block
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916-fix_zpci_report_status_pdev_leak-v3-0-61a2f980e71d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ramesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ts@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®