From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36834490BF6; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 09:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789549580; cv=none; b=Fz0S06bZNwtSaEt85PHqXEIzrF3LM/hKyakjyj6oA8Sd6oa3NVnp8AIUkadMKCSbYcJ0c2+6spzPFvIQTzy811SsygnwXk2Bno4C+pSBilnpHk8Do82fg2tI5HDLRFzxwAMkh7l2WcWKaOuJ6MG39YpbWybkVtYJpEmbZa6Aeig= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789549580; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+VDz1J5rdGERVVmAIcntFj3n3C5YKbpcFcBBMkMOPGw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UdD0ytfrJqrN/1cw4m0GwvYPR03dC40DZzECYlptQyZoH92ItA3yULt50a7em9aFfAXfb41XeJcNA+rIz6prFQCOYxUcsmVFqtrWAoSOJG3TFMbO9+iGUHpp8Sjg5O5zp6e/8nPmebMITjAc4BGC2ErPHKisCPttNXVd6NGrStI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R3xlIEui; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R3xlIEui" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17D511F000FF; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 09:06:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789549573; bh=Vko3nN/Bde41QZ/UJ3rIB6o26nKsrR7Gyy/tMZzX+jQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=R3xlIEuirF2XQxnG9v2cjLvwpeGGypB/TNegNrxprnX14tynRfrLKpH+zaMwkKsyh OtTcNNIymxqDViyboHCnyLZ7O2ammaucwhR3vPAOQbzsRqBU8cNmmNi3UyoCmlDwSv VBrlSb9wvrKjhlEidqPXpDUdDfgTpWoUxJ2DODI8lHraXiKDud1SG7i5MOveKjG7oh Z2H/Sox6P/H6hdBKG6Tb2fPHAnTH9XP4cOM4rgFQ53P1Pbhjf1xmGq4ZbFLZ/rHY6D vhjoZwoC+41SoDTcr+za/HgW/UW2dFJ6aAQ+c2qWygMDVecuDijBr+lHgxSfbBUlaB X6290AbrgOJxg== Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:06:08 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Griffin Kroah-Hartman Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Apitzsch , Luca Weiss , Daniel Scally , Sakari Ailus , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: media: i2c: dw9800: Redocument DW9800K Message-ID: <20260916-meek-qualified-penguin-fd8cea@quoll> References: <20260914-b4-dw9800k_cleanup-v2-0-6553273aaa33@fairphone.com> <20260914-b4-dw9800k_cleanup-v2-1-6553273aaa33@fairphone.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260914-b4-dw9800k_cleanup-v2-1-6553273aaa33@fairphone.com> On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 12:25:56PM +0200, Griffin Kroah-Hartman wrote: > The DW9800K's properties are too different to justify sharing the same > bindings file as the dw9719, Create a separate bindings documentation > for the Dongwoon Anatech DW9800K with it's updated properties. > > More specifically: > > The DW9800K did not share the SAC1 and SAC6 modes > that the DW9719 used. > > The DW9800K does not actually have a register that matches the property > description of vcm-prescale, instead the description of the clock-presc > in the DW9768 is much more applicable to the functionality required > according to the DW9800K datasheet. I don't get why it does not match. You have exactly the same first part of the description, look: dw9719: Indication of VCM switching frequency dividing rate select Your code: Indication of VCM internal clock dividing rate select, Both are dividing the VCM clock rate, no? Best regards, Krzysztof