mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: paul@pbarker.dev, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
	magnus.damm@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
	sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 03/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Simplify gPTP start and stop
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:41:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916094107.GP1991210@fsdn.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915015437.881154-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Hello Jakub,

On 2026-09-14 18:54:37 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> ---
> net: ethernet: ravb: Simplify gPTP start and stop
> 
> The patch folds the gptp-flag ravb_ptp_init() and ravb_ptp_stop() calls into
> ravb_dmac_init() and ravb_stop_dma(), and drops the info->gptp part of the
> two combined gptp/ccc_gac call sites in ravb_open() and ravb_close().  It is
> described as having no functional change.
> 
> A few questions about the resulting start/stop balance below.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > index a89f6fe7866fe..2d0022a4f85c3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > @@ -707,7 +707,15 @@ static int ravb_dmac_init(struct net_device *ndev)
> >  		return error;
> >  
> >  	/* Setting the control will start the AVB-DMAC process. */
> > -	return ravb_set_opmode(ndev, CCC_OPC_OPERATION);
> > +	error = ravb_set_opmode(ndev, CCC_OPC_OPERATION);
> > +	if (error)
> > +		return error;
> > +
> > +	/* Initialise PTP Clock driver */
> > +	if (info->gptp)
> > +		ravb_ptp_init(ndev, priv->pdev);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void ravb_get_tx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev)
> > @@ -1115,6 +1123,10 @@ static int ravb_stop_dma(struct net_device *ndev)
> >  			netdev_err(ndev, "failed to stop AXI BUS\n");
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/* Stop PTP Clock driver */
> > +	if (info->gptp)
> > +		ravb_ptp_stop(ndev);
> > +
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Is the new stop reachable on all exits from ravb_stop_dma()?  It sits after
> three unconditional error returns earlier in the same function:
> 
> 	error = ravb_wait(ndev, TCCR, info->tccr_mask, 0);
> 	if (error)
> 		return error;
> 
> 	error = ravb_wait(ndev, CSR, CSR_TPO0 | CSR_TPO1 | CSR_TPO2 | CSR_TPO3,
> 			  0);
> 	if (error)
> 		return error;
> 	...
> 	error = ravb_wait(ndev, CSR, CSR_RPO, 0);
> 	if (error)
> 		return error;
> 
> Before this patch, ravb_close(), ravb_set_ringparam(),
> ravb_tx_timeout_work() and ravb_open()'s unwind all called ravb_ptp_stop()
> unconditionally before ravb_stop_dma(), so a wait timeout did not affect the
> unregister.
> 
> ravb_close() treats a ravb_stop_dma() failure as non-fatal:
> 
> 	/* Set the config mode to stop the AVB-DMAC's processes */
> 	if (ravb_stop_dma(ndev) < 0)
> 		netdev_err(ndev,
> 			   "device will be stopped after h/w processes are done.\n");
> 
> and then goes on to free the rings, program CCC_OPC_RESET and drop the
> runtime-PM reference.  For .gptp devices (ravb_gen2_hw_info,
> ravb_rzv2m_hw_info) does that leave the PHC registered after ndo_stop has
> returned success, with the gPTP interrupt enables still set because
> ravb_ptp_disable()/ravb_ptp_sync_irqs() in ravb_ptp_stop() were skipped?
> 
> A subsequent open then runs ravb_dmac_init() -> ravb_ptp_init(), whose
> 
> 	WRITE_ONCE(priv->ptp.clock, clock);
> 
> overwrites the only handle, while ravb_ptp_stop() only xchg()s the current
> pointer.  Since ravb_remove() has no independent PTP unregister and ends in
> free_netdev(), does the stranded registration leave ptp_clock_info pointing
> into freed netdev private memory, reachable through the surviving
> /dev/ptpN?
> 
> ravb_ptp_stop() looks idempotent (xchg of priv->ptp.clock), so would doing
> the stop before the fallible ravb_wait() calls, or on all exit paths, keep
> the old behaviour?

If any of the stop steps before the gPTP fail the device is borked. I 
guess the LLM would say the same thing if any other of the calls in the 
stop chain where reordered too.

> 
> >  	/* Stop AVB-DMAC process */
> >  	return ravb_set_opmode(ndev, CCC_OPC_CONFIG);
> >  }
> > @@ -1719,9 +1731,7 @@ static int ravb_set_ringparam(struct net_device *ndev,
> >  
> >  	if (netif_running(ndev)) {
> >  		netif_device_detach(ndev);
> > -		/* Stop PTP Clock driver */
> > -		if (info->gptp)
> > -			ravb_ptp_stop(ndev);
> > +
> >  		/* Wait for DMA stopping */
> >  		error = ravb_stop_dma(ndev);
> >  		if (error) {
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Same question for this call site: with the explicit pre-stop removed, does a
> ravb_stop_dma() timeout here return with the interface detached and the Gen2
> gPTP clock still registered?

Same reply.

> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -1961,7 +1967,7 @@ static int ravb_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> >  	ravb_emac_init(ndev);
> >  
> >  	/* Initialise PTP Clock driver */
> > -	if (info->gptp || info->ccc_gac)
> > +	if (info->ccc_gac)
> >  		ravb_ptp_init(ndev, priv->pdev);
> >  
> >  	/* PHY control start */
> > @@ -1974,9 +1980,6 @@ static int ravb_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> >  out_ptp_stop:
> > -	/* Stop PTP Clock driver */
> > -	if (info->gptp || info->ccc_gac)
> > -		ravb_ptp_stop(ndev);
> >  	ravb_stop_dma(ndev);
> >  out_set_reset:
> >  	ravb_set_opmode(ndev, CCC_OPC_RESET);
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Does this leak the registered PTP clock for info->ccc_gac devices when
> ravb_open() fails?

This seems to be a real find, nice. Will fix.

> 
> ravb_open() still calls ravb_ptp_init() for info->ccc_gac, but the
> counterpart at out_ptp_stop: is gone, and the relocated teardown in
> ravb_stop_dma() is gated on:
> 
> 	if (info->gptp)
> 		ravb_ptp_stop(ndev);
> 
> info->gptp and info->ccc_gac are mutually exclusive (.gptp in
> ravb_gen2_hw_info and ravb_rzv2m_hw_info, .ccc_gac in ravb_gen3_hw_info and
> ravb_gen4_hw_info), so nothing unregisters the clock on this path.
> 
> The failure right after the init is a plain software path, ravb_phy_start()
> -> ravb_phy_init() returns -ENOENT when of_phy_connect() fails, or
> propagates an of_phy_register_fixed_link() error:
> 
> 	error = ravb_phy_init(ndev);
> 	if (error)
> 		return error;
> 
> Since ndo_open failed, ndo_stop/ravb_close() is never called, so the
> if (info->ccc_gac) ravb_ptp_stop(ndev); in ravb_close() does not run either.
> Does that leave /dev/ptpN live on a block that ravb_open() then puts into
> CCC_OPC_RESET and runtime-suspends, so gettime64/settime64/adjfine perform
> MMIO with no runtime-PM reference held, and with GIC/GIS enables still set?
> 
> And on a later successful open, ravb_ptp_init()'s
> WRITE_ONCE(priv->ptp.clock, clock) replaces the handle, so the first
> registration can no longer be reached by ravb_ptp_stop().  With
> ravb_remove() calling free_netdev() without any PHC unregister, does that
> become a use-after-free through the surviving PTP chardev?
> 
> Would keeping if (info->ccc_gac) ravb_ptp_stop(ndev); at out_ptp_stop:
> restore the balance?
> 
> > @@ -2020,10 +2023,6 @@ static void ravb_tx_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >  
> >  	netif_tx_stop_all_queues(ndev);
> >  
> > -	/* Stop PTP Clock driver */
> > -	if (info->gptp)
> > -		ravb_ptp_stop(ndev);
> > -
> >  	/* Wait for DMA stopping */
> >  	if (ravb_stop_dma(ndev)) {
> >  		/* If ravb_stop_dma() fails, the hardware is still operating
> > @@ -2056,10 +2055,6 @@ static void ravb_tx_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >  	ravb_emac_init(ndev);
> >  
> >  out:
> > -	/* Initialise PTP Clock driver */
> > -	if (info->gptp)
> > -		ravb_ptp_init(ndev, priv->pdev);
> > -
> >  	netif_tx_start_all_queues(ndev);
> >  
> >  out_unlock:
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can TX-timeout recovery now resume traffic with the Gen2 gPTP clock left
> unregistered?
> 
> In ravb_stop_dma() the new stop runs just before the fallible final
> transition:
> 
> 	/* Stop PTP Clock driver */
> 	if (info->gptp)
> 		ravb_ptp_stop(ndev);
> 
> 	/* Stop AVB-DMAC process */
> 	return ravb_set_opmode(ndev, CCC_OPC_CONFIG);
> 
> If that ravb_set_opmode() times out, ravb_tx_timeout_work() takes the
> "hardware is still operating" branch:
> 
> 	if (ravb_stop_dma(ndev)) {
> 		...
> 		ravb_rcv_snd_enable(ndev);
> 		goto out;
> 	}
> 	...
> out:
> 	netif_tx_start_all_queues(ndev);
> 
> With the ravb_ptp_init() at out: removed, RX/TX and the TX queues are
> re-enabled for .gptp devices while the PHC has been unregistered and the
> gPTP interrupts cleared.  Previously this path always re-registered the
> clock when resuming operation.  Does hardware timestamping and /dev/ptpN
> now stay gone until a full close/open cycle?
> 
> [ ... ]

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 17:30 [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] ravb: Add gPTP support for Gen4 Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Remove gPTP control from WoL setup and restore Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-15  1:54   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-16  8:20     ` Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Move programming of gPTP timer interval Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-15  1:54   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-16  8:25     ` Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Simplify gPTP start and stop Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-15  1:54   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-16  9:41     ` Niklas Söderlund [this message]
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Remove redundant argument to ravb_ptp_init() Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Propagate error from ptp_clock_register() Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-15  1:54   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Replace gPTP flags with callbacks Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-15  1:54   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Add callback for gPTP probe Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-15  1:54   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Add callback for gPTP clock index Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/10] dt-bindings: net: renesas,etheravb: Add optional gPTP phandle for Gen4 Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-15  1:54   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-09 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/10] net: ethernet: ravb: Add gPTP support " Niklas Söderlund
2026-09-15  1:54   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260916094107.GP1991210@fsdn.se \
    --to=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@pbarker.dev \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®