From: Ryan Leung <untilscour@protonmail.com>
To: ricardo@pardini.net, alchark@flipper.net
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
finley.xiao@rock-chips.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
heiko@sntech.de, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
michael@walle.cc, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, robh@kernel.org,
srini@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
untilscour@protonmail.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] nvmem: Derive Rockchip MAC addresses from the OTP CPU ID
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:34:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916123355.4507-1-untilscour@protonmail.com> (raw)
Hi Ricardo, Alexey,
> On 02/09/2026 15:07, Alexey Charkov wrote:
> > Rockchip SoCs are shipped with a unique CPU ID in their internal OTP
> > memory, and Rockchip bootloaders use it to give boards which have no
> > dedicated storage for a MAC address a stable one anyway: they hash the CPU
> > ID and patch the resulting addresses into the device tree they hand over.
> >
> > Kernels started without that fixup, e.g. straight from the SPL in Falcon
> > mode or by any other loader which does not implement Rockchip's derivation,
> > fall back to random MAC addresses which change on every boot.
> >
> > Formalize the derivation in the DT binding and add a Linux kernel driver
> > implementing it, so that a Linux image can use the same stable addresses
> > regardless of the boot flow.
> >
> > Only RK3576 is wired up here, that being the SoC I can test on. Other
> > Rockchip SoCs keep the same CPU ID at a different OTP offset - 0x7 rather
> > than 0xa on RK3588, for instance - which makes supporting them a two-line
> > addition to the driver's match table plus the layout node.
> Hi Alexey,
>
> I went off trying this on RK3588 and - exactly like you said - it
> translates perfectly there, just with a different offset. Thanks!
>
> Not content, I went for RK356x as well - and that revealed what I think
> is a snag.
>
> Both RK3576 and RK3588 currently describe their fixed cells as direct
> children of the OTP node -- turns out that is the "legacy" way, which
> works due to 'add_legacy_fixed_of_cells'.
>
> But RK356x/3528/3562, done more recently [1], use a single
> 'fixed-layout' with child cells; and there can only ever be one layout,
> so we wouldn't be able to use the new layout for those.
>
> I imagine one way around it would be to allow such fixed cells also
> under the new layout, by delegating to 'nvmem_add_cells_from_dt()' and
> adding patternProperties with '$ref: fixed-cell.yaml' in the binding,
> similar to what fixed-layout.yaml does, but I'm unsure that would be a
> good idea?
>
> Either way, thanks for this, it really helps with Falcon mode and edk2;
> I can also use it for the fixed-function RTL8125 PCIe NICs I started
> describing [2] (and will eventually send a v5).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260312213019.13965-3-heiko@sntech.de/
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20260617-rk3588-dts-rtl-eth-describe-dt-alias-v4-0-2bd38922d129@pardini.net/
>
> mvg,
> Ricardo
What about changing the driver to handle something like:
otp: otp@... {
compatible = "rockchip,rk3528-otp";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
nvmem-layout {
compatible = "fixed-layout";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
otp_id: id@a {
reg = <0x0a 0x10>;
};
};
};
otp_mac: otp-mac {
compatible = "rockchip,otp-cpuid-mac";
nvmem-cells = <&otp_id>;
nvmem-cell-names = "source";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
otp_mac_address: mac-address@0 {
reg = <0 0x10>;
#nvmem-cell-cells = <1>;
};
};
using devm_nvmem_cell_get("source") to read the otp cell.
Then a match table would not be necessary and it would work with every
SoC, even those without the fixed-layout nvmem, because of
add_legacy_fixed_of_cells as you mentioned.
Best regards,
Ryan
reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916123355.4507-1-untilscour@protonmail.com \
--to=untilscour@protonmail.com \
--cc=alchark@flipper.net \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=finley.xiao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=ricardo@pardini.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=srini@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®