mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: avoid false-positive -Wuninitialized warning, again
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:28:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916162816.39f0f33f6a48d30a71be3575@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916083456.4136132-1-arnd@kernel.org>

On Wed, 16 Sep 2026 10:34:46 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> I previously worked around a false-postive gcc-16 warning in the
> get_tier_idx() function, by adding a fake initializer. This happens with
> the -fsanitize=bounds sanitizer when the compiler creates a specialized
> variant of isolate_folios():
> 
> In function 'get_tier_idx',
>     inlined from 'isolate_folios.constprop' at mm/vmscan.c:4982:9:
> mm/vmscan.c:4934:9: error: 'sp.refaulted' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized]
>  4934 |         read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, LRU_TIER_MIN, LRU_TIER_MIN, 2, &sp);
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> mm/vmscan.c: In function 'isolate_folios.constprop':
> mm/vmscan.c:4946:25: note: 'sp.refaulted' was declared here
>  4946 |         struct ctrl_pos sp, pv = {};
>       |                         ^~
> 
> Adding another "= {}" would solve the problem as well, but to prevent
> this from happening again after the next code refactoring, try instead to
> prevent this by forbidding interprocedural optimizations on this function.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3274,8 +3274,10 @@ struct ctrl_pos {
>  	int gain;
>  };
>  
> -static void read_ctrl_pos(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int tier_min,
> -			  int tier_max, int gain, struct ctrl_pos *pos)
> +/* __noipa works around  gcc-16 warning for uninitizled use of pos->refaulted */
> +static __noipa void read_ctrl_pos(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type,
> +				  int tier_min, int tier_max, int gain,
> +				  struct ctrl_pos *pos)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;

Current code has changed here somewhat, but I expect the error is still
there.  I fixed that "uninitizled" while in there.  Altered patch is
below.


--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-avoid-false-positive-wuninitialized-warning-again
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3195,8 +3195,12 @@ struct ctrl_pos {
 	int gain;
 };
 
-static void read_ctrl_pos(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int tier, int gain,
-			  struct ctrl_pos *pos)
+/*
+ * __noipa works around  gcc-16 warning for uninitialized use of
+ * pos->refaulted
+ */
+static __noipa void read_ctrl_pos(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int tier,
+			  int gain, struct ctrl_pos *pos)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
@@ -4802,7 +4806,7 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_
 static int get_tier_idx(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type)
 {
 	int tier;
-	struct ctrl_pos sp, pv = {};
+	struct ctrl_pos sp, pv;
 
 	/*
 	 * To leave a margin for fluctuations, use a larger gain factor (2:3).
@@ -4821,7 +4825,7 @@ static int get_tier_idx(struct lruvec *l
 
 static int get_type_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness)
 {
-	struct ctrl_pos sp, pv = {};
+	struct ctrl_pos sp, pv;
 
 	if (swappiness <= MIN_SWAPPINESS + 1)
 		return LRU_GEN_FILE;
_


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16  8:34 Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-16 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-16 23:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-09-16 23:30   ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-17  2:56     ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260916162816.39f0f33f6a48d30a71be3575@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®