From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 213D2352027; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 01:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789609752; cv=none; b=qr+rzePyfYjn47RzWKM1JWRj+HHWLnjag22HHZxPRG/L4sagi/Ln5b8Oa/psKCXrrinFZLJ+trzleiKwrAh8ZL5sNcCZT4cXWijH+uAIFXPvV4bAPJOKjRX/zKFQ3o7UHo6BcAPnB+t8H82HJHYffCf0lwvd55jb2EdcJNMZxnY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789609752; c=relaxed/simple; bh=seFp9/4w6+uRbQy/hAlNyYnke7cvYcSqwU0TQARht4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q6chTQxWviB1v1jOxkG6+GKH70/202GkW+iGgvfc3g3wIzT/8JsDjGGMgbGvtLYSfDJUUAf1JJ2usXtennvNoEUQsC5MT/vpM8symPs4870pRAW5e7wQJX7fKEXwjnDs0aM5Sqf2CwdRDvMTSg7Gfvo8ljlRdxL+6q0FW4wLLoQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C25jFbQl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C25jFbQl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 457631F000FF; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 01:49:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789609750; bh=1CSXGcm+PypUwinw5y5vuixv9SgSHgM4HutpfQUzQ4k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=C25jFbQlB3pqiRgOnAwLl6DBOJXkRS1TtDBI+WBeOnz0oApE/HANKnj1n5wn//DD3 CQ219NsILHHO2UetIvlD5dlUIZv01pRsyhjuOKnV2MNQGKD8k1J9NQmNO+jpGVb6l8 G+xDDpZIPFQVQirJPiREjoSUnr0eaaDYlz+2Cyn/aoJVUeUM8NoVLTb+D32dGF2Wxt 3kAm03bBb20+oF6o1gzcaOb7m75xuvSf9ed6rJmh8mt/HBKML2xpfLRVbhw2Ilj8fc JqDL82AQcwFoX18aAb09YTKu/KKIDxOwADi7nTU/oTa/E36qO/qpeCDiwhuN/M+eFl t4WzQ2HCeKJyA== Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:49:09 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yuyang Huang Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Donald Hunter , Eric Dumazet , Ido Schimmel , Jacob Keller , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Nicolas Dichtel , Nikolaos Gkarlis , Paolo Abeni , Sabrina Dubroca , Shuah Khan , Simon Horman , Stanislav Fomichev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/4] rtnetlink: add AF_PACKET multicast dumps Message-ID: <20260916184909.279f5cac@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260914014539.5015-3-sigefriedhyy@gmail.com> References: <20260914014539.5015-1-sigefriedhyy@gmail.com> <20260914014539.5015-3-sigefriedhyy@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:45:37 +0900 Yuyang Huang wrote: > net/core/rtnetlink.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 175 insertions(+) I don't think we need another 200 LoC in rtnetlink.c ? Especially if we make a precedent for AF_PACKET and someone decides to even add more code later. The AI report about consistency check is probably good to act on as well?