From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CCB2931D5; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 01:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789610049; cv=none; b=oLb7enX+jvbJgZ+UsCqCrZuPJ/NMZpb122Os3LEhJbdjAVbKu09bSHN4GEzbWJDA/AptPVu5zW5Gii5aOG87VUm2WH3UO4/vm9kvCQSf7T/He/O9s4KJDzDcdkyU3BAqWhcuOBQLtIgIMD0OfMEKtRS3rUrezuEJcVDFYCLNr88= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789610049; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dCBNkgH0hkvfOkKcTvYLGNdkN7fzD2uXSOMAehd0UMc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f6H0Pa576FUk109Obl8/rIf4kEfpWXLnm+R5W7h+MrdAJ1xHDm58HLzbZ5emuklvAUCJdGD4YI4UB039YPQplK5WJfAL/SycsvQPk316N42pgzT9nXdAMZPLt9KDDYYFKUutFFHajkOsDfrbvwKy7M9K/dG/yaNKNE1NY0ORc68= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cYdQMABl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cYdQMABl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4FCE1F000FF; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 01:54:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789610047; bh=lJgZZsakuZqXW/oddZR8VQa35CTe8PRxmIQUO7sOKWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=cYdQMABloJWtbJ2B/fSHJAPMA8LJWkpn6fZqRjEpGXoTe+o6RyveYUUoFOwWZ2BPZ cr2iPbwxEBG58wE3ostpVUM6h+HrV3A6gaOFmKxz6JDe/CXEtN539ydQVa08kGCzMu 58vPJpublJaKsVybjqyizLxgp7V0HAEMRhrLA1txpHaBvD+1QR6QXVxKzjA+kgdtjX +wVft6iQsiBeZxqhS3wCjndGIoVX5FaCcQKhiP9VJe/VjF6VECLaFV+6KUx0j+OWOR F7IRsT2nis4e4JkQXhsooy3AxYUDcNk8gyTpbDv/2kb7GVBELYs4zoKIQ54rh86DOS AX4u3ut4VtyBA== Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:54:05 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yuyang Huang Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Donald Hunter , Eric Dumazet , Ido Schimmel , Jacob Keller , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Nicolas Dichtel , Nikolaos Gkarlis , Paolo Abeni , Sabrina Dubroca , Shuah Khan , Simon Horman , Stanislav Fomichev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/4] selftests: net: test AF_PACKET multicast dumps Message-ID: <20260916185405.2ccc6aa3@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260914014539.5015-5-sigefriedhyy@gmail.com> References: <20260914014539.5015-1-sigefriedhyy@gmail.com> <20260914014539.5015-5-sigefriedhyy@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:45:39 +0900 Yuyang Huang wrote: > + try: > + addresses = rtnl.getmulticast( > + {"ifa-family": socket.AF_PACKET, "ifa-index": dev_idx}, > + dump=True) > + except NlError as e: > + if e.error == errno.EOPNOTSUPP: > + raise KsftSkipEx( > + "kernel does not support AF_PACKET multicast dump") What's the point of catching this exception? The error for ENOPNOTSUPP will be both very rare (not sure I understand where you expect it to come from TBH), and also about as meaningful as the skip. Just let the exception propagate, it's fine. Otherwise Pylint complains: W0707: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise KsftSkipEx('kernel does not support AF_PACKET multicast dump') from e' (raise-missing-from) > + raise