From: Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
razor@blackwall.org, roopa@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] vxlan: vnifilter: reject VNIs outside the 24-bit space
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 22:34:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916193449.2552039-2-alishmery18@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916193449.2552039-1-alishmery18@gmail.com>
VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START and VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END are declared as
bare NLA_U32, so neither is bounded before vxlan_process_vni_filter()
hands them to vxlan_vni_add_del():
int v, err = 0;
...
for (v = start_vni; v <= end_vni; v++) {
v is int and end_vni is __u32, so the comparison is done unsigned. A
request carrying only START=0xffffffff gives vni_start == vni_end ==
0xffffffff, which looks like a single-VNI request. v is then -1,
"v <= end_vni" converts it to 0xffffffff and passes, v++ makes v 0, and
the loop walks the whole space upwards from there, allocating a VNI node
and a per-CPU stats block per iteration under rtnl_lock. Any range
ending at 0xffffffff behaves the same way, including narrow ones such as
START=0xfffff001 END=0xffffffff.
Separately, a VNI at or above VXLAN_N_VID is accepted and stored even
though the VXLAN header carries only 24 bits: vxlan_vni_field() shifts
without masking, so such an entry occupies its own rhashtable slot while
being truncated on the wire.
Range-validate both attributes against the 24-bit VNI space, which is
what vxlan_mdb.c already does for its own VNI attributes. The request is
then rejected during netlink policy validation, before
vxlan_process_vni_filter() is reached, and nothing is allocated. Make
the loop counter u32 while touching this: that is not what terminates
the loop, the policy check is, but it removes the signed overflow past
INT_MAX and matches the u32 vni parameter vxlan_vni_add() already takes.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260909092645.3105263-1-alishmery18@gmail.com/
drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
index dd94085e0886..5aaaaeee8110 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
@@ -459,9 +459,15 @@ static int vxlan_vnifilter_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb
return err;
}
+static const struct netlink_range_validation vni_filter_vni_range = {
+ .max = VXLAN_N_VID - 1,
+};
+
static const struct nla_policy vni_filter_entry_policy[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_MAX + 1] = {
- [VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ [VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START] = NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(NLA_U32,
+ &vni_filter_vni_range),
+ [VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END] = NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(NLA_U32,
+ &vni_filter_vni_range),
[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_GROUP] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof_field(struct iphdr, daddr)),
[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_GROUP6] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
};
@@ -814,7 +820,8 @@ static int vxlan_vni_add_del(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, __u32 start_vni,
int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct vxlan_vni_group *vg;
- int v, err = 0;
+ int err = 0;
+ u32 v;
vg = rtnl_dereference(vxlan->vnigrp);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 19:34 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] vxlan: vnifilter: bound one request and account per-VNI memory Ali Firas
2026-09-16 19:34 ` Ali Firas [this message]
2026-09-19 0:21 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] vxlan: vnifilter: reject VNIs outside the 24-bit space netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] vxlan: vnifilter: bound the number of VNIs one request may touch Ali Firas
2026-09-19 0:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net: account per-CPU netdev stats to memcg Ali Firas
2026-09-19 0:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] vxlan: vnifilter: account the VNI node " Ali Firas
2026-09-19 0:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] selftests: net: test the vxlan vnifilter VNI limit Ali Firas
2026-09-19 0:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916193449.2552039-2-alishmery18@gmail.com \
--to=alishmery18@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®