From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: rename channel mask and value macros
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 01:53:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917015334.1f43bd02@jic23-hlaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916-mcp47feb02_refactor-v6-8-285464651f89@microchip.com>
On Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:16:34 +0300
Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com> wrote:
> Rename generic DAC_CTRL_MASK/VAL macros to MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK/VAL
> in order to clearly indicate for which control registers these channel
> masks are suitable.
>
> Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260528125140.16a8f173@jic23-huawei/
> Signed-off-by: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> index 8dac4e2fb74fe4563324343ce215af3389129130..5c09ca25a75e0ecb2bfc5a2d5e62e5f7d3156810 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
> #define MCP47FEB02_NV_I2C_SLAVE_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
>
> /* Voltage reference, Power-Down control register and DAC Wiperlock status register fields */
> -#define DAC_CTRL_MASK(ch) (GENMASK(1, 0) << (2 * (ch)))
> -#define DAC_CTRL_VAL(ch, val) ((val) << (2 * (ch)))
> +#define MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(ch) (GENMASK(1, 0) << (2 * (ch)))
> +#define MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_VAL(ch, val) ((val) << (2 * (ch)))
Can we drop this one...
>
> /* Gain Control and I2C Slave Address Register fields */
> #define DAC_GAIN_MASK(ch) (BIT(0) << (8 + (ch)))
> @@ -555,7 +555,8 @@ static int mcp47feb02_suspend(struct device *dev)
> data->chdata[ch].powerdown = true;
> pd_mode = data->chdata[ch].powerdown_mode + 1;
> ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_POWER_DOWN_REG_ADDR,
> - DAC_CTRL_MASK(ch), DAC_CTRL_VAL(ch, pd_mode));
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(ch),
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_VAL(ch, pd_mode));
.. and here have a local for mask.
mask = MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(ch);
ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_POWER_DOWN_REG_ADDR,
mask, field_prep(mask, pd_mode));
Same in all the other cases. Will then match you do the field_get().
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -587,7 +588,8 @@ static int mcp47feb02_resume(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
>
> ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_VREF_REG_ADDR,
> - DAC_CTRL_MASK(ch), DAC_CTRL_VAL(ch, pd_mode));
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(ch),
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_VAL(ch, pd_mode));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -598,8 +600,8 @@ static int mcp47feb02_resume(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
>
> ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_POWER_DOWN_REG_ADDR,
> - DAC_CTRL_MASK(ch),
> - DAC_CTRL_VAL(ch, MCP47FEB02_NORMAL_OPERATION));
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(ch),
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_VAL(ch, MCP47FEB02_NORMAL_OPERATION));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -656,7 +658,8 @@ static ssize_t mcp47feb02_write_powerdown(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, uintptr_t p
> */
> tmp_pd_mode = state ? (data->chdata[reg].powerdown_mode + 1) : MCP47FEB02_NORMAL_OPERATION;
> ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_POWER_DOWN_REG_ADDR,
> - DAC_CTRL_MASK(reg), DAC_CTRL_VAL(reg, tmp_pd_mode));
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(reg),
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_VAL(reg, tmp_pd_mode));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -822,7 +825,7 @@ static int mcp47feb02_ch_scale(struct mcp47feb02_data *data, int ch, int scale)
> }
>
> ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_VREF_REG_ADDR,
> - DAC_CTRL_MASK(ch), DAC_CTRL_VAL(ch, tmp_val));
> + MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(ch), MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_VAL(ch, tmp_val));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1027,7 +1030,7 @@ static int mcp47feb02_init_ctrl_regs(struct mcp47feb02_data *data)
> return ret;
> data->chdata[i].dac_data = dac_val;
>
> - data->chdata[i].ref_mode = field_get(DAC_CTRL_MASK(i), vref_ch);
> + data->chdata[i].ref_mode = field_get(MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(i), vref_ch);
> data->chdata[i].use_2x_gain = field_get(DAC_GAIN_MASK(i), gain_ch);
>
> /*
> @@ -1071,7 +1074,7 @@ static int mcp47feb02_init_ctrl_regs(struct mcp47feb02_data *data)
> break;
> }
>
> - pd_tmp = field_get(DAC_CTRL_MASK(i), pd_ch);
> + pd_tmp = field_get(MCP47FEB02_VREF_PD_MASK(i), pd_ch);
> data->chdata[i].powerdown_mode = pd_tmp ? (pd_tmp - 1) : pd_tmp;
> data->chdata[i].powerdown = !!(data->chdata[i].powerdown_mode);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 14:16 [PATCH v6 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: initialize dac_data field in channel data struct at probe Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Fix gain field initialization for active channels Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_get() instead of custom dynamic macros Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 15:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Return len when disabling EEPROM store Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Increase EEPROM Programming Write Cycle Time Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe error on missing label Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: correct typo from a comment Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 15:49 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: rename channel mask and value macros Ariana Lazar
2026-09-17 0:53 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 15:26 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-17 0:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917015334.1f43bd02@jic23-hlaptop \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®