Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] xfs: change xfs log item refcount design

[Jeffin Philip <jeffinphilip14@gmail.com>]

On Wed, September 16 2026 at 10:28 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 03:55:00PM +0530, Jeffin Philip wrote:
>> This patch series is the first of the series where we attempt to convert
>> the XFS Log item reference counting design to be more generic
>> compared to the previous type-specific state to fix the "zero
>> refcount but in AIL means alive" state. The patch series follows
>> instructions outlined here[1].
>> 
>> Obviously, the wrappers will be integrated in type-specific functions
>> later on.
>> 
>> No behavioral change as of yet.
>> 
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aqI6v-_dc2DDSbgB@dread/
>> 
>> Jeffin Philip (2):
>>   xfs: add lockref and generic helpers for refcounting
>>   xfs: change xfs_trans_ail_delete return type to bool
>
>It's great to see you starting on this, but there's not much point
>in just posting wrappers that aren't used by anything. Until there
>is code that uses them, we can't really say anythign useful about
>the wrappers. e.g.
>
>Is the API optimal? Don't know.
>
>Is open coding the init correct for the generic case or is that just
>projecting an antipattern from the BLI reference counting? Don't
>know.
>
>And so on. Hence it's best to present the wrappers with the code
>that then uses them so we have the necessary context with which to
>review them.

The BLI changes have almost been finished and I am testing them. The
reason I did not post it is because I wanted it to face more proper
review and that is likely to be stricter when the patches are
few. I could still write the entire implementation and post it as a
giant patch series provided it does not fatigue the reviewers from
reviewing several tens of patches at a time. Until then, I feel like
it mould be much better to post 1 implementation step at a time in 1
patchset. If you prefer otherwise, that can be done too.

Thanks,
Jeffin.