From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9192C1788; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 03:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789614078; cv=none; b=HBljUhZXR8f4jU/TIwivW0hraNL6mA0ymefXx/KJjVpxoZwus4e0n3qqTrM8B9cY9MZG2jGR2LUiMQDELGtmiylXhiqCShtjUlV90mVSQnog24s0xxmSUmjdSNy4tTjCQXpLvBFwyaXb8QPI0zBn5U14AQTnhC3waQQDbOgNTmw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789614078; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QWJAJqvH1e/AGtyDInlJSpQJy2Zn0TUCa22Mxp86lic=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VDVm8uARxVNRQmIY/axiElxNyH1J6RLxxqFK4cXPtGMZVpMeScl4LxrGVm8eoR+hVXX9qq/x/4qIL5UnBoPNkeiabShh46ZtZ+ZW3PWxgWDMSQuGNr4MwpXqlTjz8nISnSEvneYyKWhQXnHADHYWXt806Dzyl2nUmZRqurR1zSs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nEaz2tU+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nEaz2tU+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74E1E1F000FF; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 03:01:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789614070; bh=YZ3EH78hvQbWNUoIiyebmp9fOz2qE1EZcl3jVsHy+wo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=nEaz2tU+DVWd6u3p15MU/SMK2qYh2FAQ+RBHctm1iQ/YBI6KvzERTvC8AeRb2R6dY hbFBDASgAZgbS8hNf4dKuEkgo93YfdoVAVtAjhC+4kr5WoKa+Ph5P1tufb8TUNtcKP QHilyA2isfSgrzYyfcSeNLEHgHSBLdcsMzfA+bl55aTGYBxNsRVP9BU9gJUjpAUx2B f6ZVYGmEIdqDc88lQxAm+zJ/5+Q3DcHTsfUjJoBAKpEoVtUL7LBCkZ/ivioNeva3kI rIaHqdBjCwl4GKaMmPA5ASJGvURzgCq86qgKidUwakCi7dYZGaPMutW3vgkjyYc69t OPtyXLAVD16DA== Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 04:01:02 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Chang Yu Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Andy Shevchenko , David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shi Hao , "Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" , Joshua Crofts , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iio: light: add AS7343 multi-spectral sensor driver Message-ID: <20260917040102.59be257c@jic23-hlaptop> In-Reply-To: References: <20260912013912.51887-1-marcus.yu.56@gmail.com> <20260912013912.51887-3-marcus.yu.56@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 19:49:36 -0700 Chang Yu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 11:00:18AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 06:39:12PM -0700, Chang Yu wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > +static int as7343_setup_device(struct device *dev, struct as7343_data *data) > > > +{ > > > + struct regmap *map = data->regmap; > > > + unsigned int val; > > > + __le16 step; > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + /* Power on */ > > > + ret = regmap_set_bits(map, AS7343_ENABLE, AS7343_ENABLE_PON); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + > > > + /* Need to set REG_BANK to 1 before we can access ID */ > > > + ret = regmap_set_bits(map, AS7343_CFG0, AS7343_CFG0_REG_BANK); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + > > > + ret = regmap_read(map, AS7343_ID, &val); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > > > + if (val != 0x81) > > > + dev_info(dev, "Unknown device ID: %x\n", val); > > > > Wouldn't be better to define 0x81 with meaningful name? > > > > If I remeber correctly Jonathan prefers just putting 0x81 inline. I'm > OK with either style so I'll defer to the judgement to Jonathan here. I briefly wondered why I said that and went to look. I've been reading too many multipart drivers that do #define THING1_ID 42 #define THING2_ID 43 struct something_chip_info thing1_chip_info = { .id = THING1_ID, }; struct something_chip_info thing2_chip_info = { .id = THING2_ID, }; And in those cases it doesn't make any sense to have defines. So I was thinking don't do it here either so we'd be in a nicer position when another device (maybe) shows up. Jonathan