From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C3B647F788; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789641953; cv=none; b=DaYCToJkER4TR1mC1jh4pawO9YZ1v0k/VXolQwLb9Q5RAycWRo2cc3Tmndo8Xe6Ru4NnvJ0IGv7DkWY1nT66DqxCabJbMO8JUrPZdREgl2iZJq8/9nD8vHg7+MgHS+rj7+aFYDx6UXeCc7r/FjT2b7BKeYpqi0rozWRbxl94yTI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789641953; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ECo9cdo977FkiesxllRgUw3yGG4DUboNuVLo4Q7lpYg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cj2fPcKuGThNWY10JitFbpknsMJ0ZPlHNvL+5oJ5oReangeLulOsIopQKymTQMXbf57jxo+ML6Vbkly05v2l6z0SHT6nSr+Wcn4qzABpgndX1PtoJkF4nQBvNOaSfygiz+xYRY1BxlsyhkhaMHUxh8ZsCK+BCha2WhWD0t+1TEo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Zop+mrjL; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=IjKXUjsu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Zop+mrjL"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="IjKXUjsu" Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:45:44 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1789641950; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iTPmmmxEvbkY6yRJOu+LwHlz+vZaSs5Q5lGUiSehc0g=; b=Zop+mrjLVSwa6YNF0PYj+B7tNsAhRULqgtoiBcyWSOOzgPW5fCutxkK0csbN1RdDac7AB1 C+9RXDu5HRkLR3xx0FkFDkU5SloeM1y+y1ainxX/Ha8WbfTM+AJPF/ypJUVipMPMdf3Dcc T/Qsbe5F3LM2n0ysVcoEgTasjqcThOvRQYQ24/VMynKNQ8UEy3QqEiFKiqPYQh/yA2ONKI N3ZDF2NErGvCXU8dYsn3FGY4KmV87XatDS3QZovYROuOnL8LKuBWDEzwOTlrCpdG+yCzgv i6QFyi66LJYOPQX2ZFgsyKSuI5VTwqcX88J/zR5+lk/4kkxxsjuHv2G7Nb0CnA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1789641950; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iTPmmmxEvbkY6yRJOu+LwHlz+vZaSs5Q5lGUiSehc0g=; b=IjKXUjsu4IxVTuMW0xCBcGaYuuEqMPKHAbcejSkWIKlgq7fVoHitp8O7rltsI5wyQ4h1i5 XFTWHeY6uJgEj3CA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= , Arnd Bergmann , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Tingmao Wang , Justin Suess , =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=BCnther?= Noack , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] landlock: work around gcc-16 -Wuninitialized warning Message-ID: <20260917104544.3trW9Jq1@linutronix.de> References: <20260915201036.3527935-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20260916084947.6QDy8KZQ@linutronix.de> <20260916.shai0tha3IPa@digikod.net> <57b5869d-7411-46e8-ade6-6d2a7fea02ac@app.fastmail.com> <20260917070915.Ix8TOn5Y@linutronix.de> <1192c2df-d39a-4d43-ad57-68b0167759f5@app.fastmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1192c2df-d39a-4d43-ad57-68b0167759f5@app.fastmail.com> On 2026-09-17 12:26:17 [+0200], Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I checked again and found that this is a config that did produce > the issue a few weeks ago, but doesn't today for me. > I found a different config from this week and managed to reproduce > the problem on today's linux-next using both gcc-16.2 and gcc-17.0 > from yesterday, so there is still a related issue that is not > fixed in gcc, even though one at least one of them was fixed. Confirmed. I see the warning on arm64 while x86-64 is quiet. The patch fixes the issue. You might need to update gcc bug tracker. > Arnd Sebastian