From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75983905E0; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 01:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789696774; cv=none; b=G3SEH62GvkZGRAd445yP+QJa/4W2V0YZNqMbz39fY/A7Em8Pw4bHpRXbkdzUNCP/EC/b65UD3alx4KgmmoyD394zfY3NRoZyrBWitiNCvaY6/6AiX9pqQ7hwZHu49Kqg+aBrPCoxPgbgPYwXDa+GBNObwRPyvW7T8sL6ljxcUbI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789696774; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gYdkWASzdto4w7d3rcLJnbDDH4XmI/DyXN8bJd/CAek=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=avKkYp5tdAEIRrVIA4LMtaakNnpWcymSPORg/1mbw18FFwzwdVyy2Iyp6u4zxx0RRUpqjVxTbCsubW58/XMByeOEiLcv+EzZ3eGAxvaPg1919B0oOZk1f/S0NseyyRJCRK6ZRR/3qAdsdgiS1ryx+qdvtb+zjQ7BOTwnPQOlcuQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dacUQKQy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dacUQKQy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E23D31F000FF; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 01:59:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789696768; bh=gYdkWASzdto4w7d3rcLJnbDDH4XmI/DyXN8bJd/CAek=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=dacUQKQyWtVSbYPvJiBlAX4GrtAshKdsLhPjk2g1CFDbfWR9yKA+LGhJHxkG6w7Rq tHS5KdnRvZwtMW2LZ3KUqrbu1/7nEdD0ZqwHT9XRzT0MB7XO3daMWYipl2Mscshsl6 pbykNbM0yUOLKfeEf9t+OBTTd+CjFSXVy310N3HKtaJVOBJD/wMuWL1I8L5Kex2g0k cLdeP2Uygd5FNbjcXVi8TBNPo2y8YS+R29zgi16U4UemCiigzuRlFLntZdSar49SkV iP4QfRBuQJ6BXUa52dYBggyTiIJSYpdzCYOxHW5CYplASf/cc5Cr2Vo+cHuPQE8u9k f0A9EXJbk1bGw== Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 18:59:26 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jiayuan Chen Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Simon Horman , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Jiri Olsa , Emil Tsalapatis , Ihor Solodrai , Shuah Khan , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Hangbin Liu , Martin Karsten , Toke =?UTF-8?B?SMO4aWxhbmQtSsO4cmdlbnNlbg==?= , Lorenzo Bianconi , Eelco Chaudron , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] net: xdp: fix bpf_xdp_shrink_data() page handling on generic XDP and veth Message-ID: <20260917185926.1bb7c430@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260911135711.109338-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> References: <20260911135711.109338-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:56:50 +0800 Jiayuan Chen wrote: > I'm always confused which tree(net or bpf) should XDP target. Selfishly Id prefer net so that all our CI would just run without any manual effort on my part :) But perhaps BPF folks will disagree using basically the same argument.. :S If not perhaps please switch to net?