From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: carges@cloudflare.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
horms@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: hash uncached route lists by device
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 22:10:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917221203.1811779-1-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917-hash-bucket-route-lists-v3-0-30493a37b6eb@cloudflare.com>
From: Chris J Arges <carges@cloudflare.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 14:38:21 -0500
> We have observed hung tasks blocked on rtnl_mutex while network namespaces
> were being removed. The namespaces contained many network devices, and the
> host had accumulated a large population of entries on the global per-CPU
> uncached route lists. A perf profile collected during one incident
> attributed most of the cleanup worker's samples to rt_flush_dev():
>
> ```
> 99.92% kworker/u384:3- worker_thread
> `-88.71% process_one_work
> `-81.02% cleanup_net
> `-81.00% unregister_netdevice_many_notify
> `-79.42% notifier_call_chain
> `-78.05% fib_netdev_event
> `-77.92% rt_flush_dev
> ```
>
> For each device, rt_flush_dev() visits every possible CPU and scans the
> global uncached route population while its caller holds rtnl_mutex. If N is
> the number of devices, C the number of possible CPUs, and R the number of
> uncached routes, the cost is O(N * (C + R)).
>
> During namespace cleanup, other processes that issue RTNETLINK operations
> requiring the RTNL lock can stall until cleanup releases the lock.
>
> A minimal reproducer is available here:
> https://github.com/arges/linux-reproducers/tree/main/rtnl-flush-storm
>
> This series replaces each per-CPU uncached route list with a hash table
> using the network device as its key. Each table uses 64 buckets.
This sounds a bit overkill. Also, this series still leaves
O(N * C) loops.
Given unregistering a single device is less common than
destroying netns, I think the right approach should be to
make the route flush once in cleanup_net() + outside RTNL.
Could you try this change ? (only compile-tested)
---8<---
diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
index 46b4c67e2966..d8ce7dc0fbdc 100644
--- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
+++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
@@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ struct pernet_operations {
*/
int (*init)(struct net *net);
void (*pre_exit)(struct net *net);
+ void (*pre_exit_batch)(struct list_head *net_exit_list);
void (*exit)(struct net *net);
void (*exit_batch)(struct list_head *net_exit_list);
/* Following method is called with RTNL held. */
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index da5f881fbd3b..7fc9bf45f3b6 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -160,6 +160,9 @@ static void ops_pre_exit_list(const struct pernet_operations *ops,
list_for_each_entry(net, net_exit_list, exit_list)
ops->pre_exit(net);
}
+
+ if (ops->pre_exit_batch)
+ ops->pre_exit_batch(net_exit_list);
}
static void ops_exit_rtnl_list(const struct list_head *ops_list,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
index 8a3dc04e8cac..b8d76b6279e1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@ -1685,6 +1685,11 @@ static void __net_exit fib_net_pre_exit(struct net *net)
nl_fib_lookup_exit(net);
}
+static void __net_exit fib_net_pre_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_exit_list)
+{
+ rt_flush_dev(NULL);
+}
+
static void __net_exit fib_net_exit_rtnl(struct net *net,
struct list_head *dev_kill_list)
{
@@ -1704,6 +1709,7 @@ static void __net_exit fib_net_exit(struct net *net)
static struct pernet_operations fib_net_ops = {
.init = fib_net_init,
.pre_exit = fib_net_pre_exit,
+ .pre_exit_batch = fib_net_pre_exit_batch,
.exit_rtnl = fib_net_exit_rtnl,
.exit = fib_net_exit,
};
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index d7da2f1acbb5..d35b66b33bbc 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -1554,14 +1554,28 @@ struct uncached_list {
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct uncached_list, rt_uncached_list);
+static void rt_replace_uncached_list(struct rtable *rt)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = dst_dev(&rt->dst);
+
+ rcu_assign_pointer(rt->dst.dev_rcu, blackhole_netdev);
+ netdev_ref_replace(dev, blackhole_netdev,
+ &rt->dst.dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
+}
+
void rt_add_uncached_list(struct rtable *rt)
{
struct uncached_list *ul = raw_cpu_ptr(&rt_uncached_list);
- rt->dst.rt_uncached_list = ul;
-
spin_lock_bh(&ul->lock);
- list_add_tail(&rt->dst.rt_uncached, &ul->head);
+
+ if (!check_net(dst_dev_net_rcu(&rt->dst))) {
+ rt_replace_uncached_list(rt);
+ } else {
+ rt->dst.rt_uncached_list = ul;
+ list_add_tail(&rt->dst.rt_uncached, &ul->head);
+ }
+
spin_unlock_bh(&ul->lock);
}
@@ -1587,6 +1601,9 @@ void rt_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
struct rtable *rt, *safe;
int cpu;
+ if (dev && !check_net(dev_net(dev)))
+ return;
+
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct uncached_list *ul = &per_cpu(rt_uncached_list, cpu);
@@ -1595,11 +1612,11 @@ void rt_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
spin_lock_bh(&ul->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(rt, safe, &ul->head, dst.rt_uncached) {
- if (rt->dst.dev != dev)
+ if (rt->dst.dev != dev &&
+ (dev || check_net(dev_net(rt->dst.dev))))
continue;
- rcu_assign_pointer(rt->dst.dev_rcu, blackhole_netdev);
- netdev_ref_replace(dev, blackhole_netdev,
- &rt->dst.dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+ rt_replace_uncached_list(rt);
list_del_init(&rt->dst.rt_uncached);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&ul->lock);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 7535b09068a0..28233197e1e1 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -135,14 +135,35 @@ struct uncached_list {
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct uncached_list, rt6_uncached_list);
+static void rt6_uncached_list_replace(struct rt6_info *rt)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = dst_dev(&rt->dst);
+ struct inet6_dev *rt_idev = rt->rt6i_idev;
+
+ if (rt_idev) {
+ rt->rt6i_idev = in6_dev_get(blackhole_netdev);
+ in6_dev_put(rt_idev);
+ }
+
+ rcu_assign_pointer(rt->dst.dev_rcu, blackhole_netdev);
+ netdev_ref_replace(dev, blackhole_netdev,
+ &rt->dst.dev_tracker,
+ GFP_ATOMIC);
+}
+
void rt6_uncached_list_add(struct rt6_info *rt)
{
struct uncached_list *ul = raw_cpu_ptr(&rt6_uncached_list);
- rt->dst.rt_uncached_list = ul;
-
spin_lock_bh(&ul->lock);
- list_add_tail(&rt->dst.rt_uncached, &ul->head);
+
+ if (!check_net(dst_dev_net_rcu(&rt->dst))) {
+ rt6_uncached_list_replace(rt);
+ } else {
+ rt->dst.rt_uncached_list = ul;
+ list_add_tail(&rt->dst.rt_uncached, &ul->head);
+ }
+
spin_unlock_bh(&ul->lock);
}
@@ -161,6 +182,9 @@ static void rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
{
int cpu;
+ if (dev && !check_net(dev_net(dev)))
+ return;
+
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct uncached_list *ul = per_cpu_ptr(&rt6_uncached_list, cpu);
struct rt6_info *rt, *safe;
@@ -172,23 +196,17 @@ static void rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
list_for_each_entry_safe(rt, safe, &ul->head, dst.rt_uncached) {
struct inet6_dev *rt_idev = rt->rt6i_idev;
struct net_device *rt_dev = rt->dst.dev;
- bool handled = false;
- if (rt_idev && rt_idev->dev == dev) {
- rt->rt6i_idev = in6_dev_get(blackhole_netdev);
- in6_dev_put(rt_idev);
- handled = true;
+ if (dev) {
+ if (rt_dev != dev &&
+ (!rt_idev || rt_idev->dev != dev))
+ continue;
+ } else if (check_net(dev_net(rt_dev))) {
+ continue;
}
- if (rt_dev == dev) {
- rt->dst.dev = blackhole_netdev;
- netdev_ref_replace(rt_dev, blackhole_netdev,
- &rt->dst.dev_tracker,
- GFP_ATOMIC);
- handled = true;
- }
- if (handled)
- list_del_init(&rt->dst.rt_uncached);
+ rt6_uncached_list_replace(rt);
+ list_del_init(&rt->dst.rt_uncached);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&ul->lock);
}
@@ -6795,6 +6813,11 @@ static int __net_init ip6_route_net_init(struct net *net)
goto out;
}
+static void __net_exit ip6_route_net_pre_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_exit_list)
+{
+ rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev(NULL);
+}
+
static void __net_exit ip6_route_net_exit(struct net *net)
{
kfree(net->ipv6.fib6_null_entry);
@@ -6833,6 +6856,7 @@ static void __net_exit ip6_route_net_exit_late(struct net *net)
static struct pernet_operations ip6_route_net_ops = {
.init = ip6_route_net_init,
+ .pre_exit_batch = ip6_route_net_pre_exit_batch,
.exit = ip6_route_net_exit,
};
---8<---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 19:38 Chris J Arges
2026-09-17 19:38 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] ipv4: hash uncached routes " Chris J Arges
2026-09-17 19:38 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] ipv6: " Chris J Arges
2026-09-17 19:38 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] selftests: net: cover IPv6 uncached route device mismatch Chris J Arges
2026-09-17 22:10 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-09-18 0:38 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: hash uncached route lists by device Chris Arges
2026-09-18 4:19 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-18 18:24 ` Chris Arges
2026-09-18 18:41 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917221203.1811779-1-kuniyu@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®