From: zjamg <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
To: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
Cc: Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:04:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918020412.82878-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Hello,
This patch addresses several issues in the NCI core logical connection
handling where an unsolicited or malformed CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet
can corrupt connection tracking, shadow the static RF connection, and
cause TX queue stalls or hung waiters.
Problem Overview:
=================
In the NCI core stack, logical connections can be created by sending
NCI_OP_CORE_CONN_CREATE_CMD to the NFCC, which answers with
NCI_OP_CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP. nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() parses
this response and adds a new struct nci_conn_info to ndev->conn_info_list.
However, nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() had several vulnerabilities:
1. No Pending Command Check:
It did not check whether a connection creation command was actually
pending. An unsolicited or delayed CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet
unconditionally allocated and inserted a connection into
ndev->conn_info_list, and called nci_req_complete(ndev, status),
prematurely completing whatever unrelated request was in-flight.
2. Connection ID Collision & Shadowing:
Dynamic logical connections allocated by the NFCC must not use
NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID (0x00) or collide with existing connections.
Furthermore, nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() used list_add() to
prepend the new connection to ndev->conn_info_list. Because
connection lookups (e.g. in nci_tx_work() and
nci_data_exchange_complete()) use first-match semantics, prepending
allowed an injected connection with conn_id = 0 to shadow
ndev->rf_conn_info. This caused:
- Cross-connection credit accounting in nci_tx_work().
- TX queue stall when credits == 0 (frame wedged without timer).
- Dropped RX completion (cb == NULL on the rogue connection, hanging
the real waiter registered by nci_transceive()).
3. Missing Length Validation:
The handler accessed payload fields without checking whether
skb->len >= sizeof(struct nci_core_conn_create_rsp), risking
out-of-bounds reads.
4. Spurious HCI conn_info Assignment:
ndev->hci_dev->conn_info was updated whenever cur_params.id matched
hci_dev->nfcee_id. Because both default to 0, non-NFCEE connections
(such as loopback) erroneously updated ndev->hci_dev->conn_info.
Solution:
=========
- Add an NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING flag in enum nci_flag to track
in-flight connection creation commands, and reject unsolicited or
delayed responses.
- Validate packet length before reading payload fields.
- Reject responses that allocate NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID or duplicate
existing connection IDs.
- Append new connections with list_add_tail() instead of list_add().
- Restrict ndev->hci_dev->conn_info assignment to NFCEE destination
types.
Non-overlap with adjacent fixes:
================================
This issue does not overlap with the adjacent upstream fixes in this
area: Lin Ma's commit 1b1499a817c9 ("nfc: nci: fix the UAF of
rf_conn_info object") addresses a use-after-free in the conn_close
path, and Yun Zhou's commit d56575a2595e ("nfc: nci: fix use of
uninitialized memory in CORE_INIT_RSP parsing") addresses a different
packet. The problem fixed here is the list_add() head-insertion
combined with first-match lookup semantics (core.c:43-54), which lets
a forged connection shadow the real one.
Testing:
========
Verified with QEMU arm64 empirical test harness. Unsolicited
CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP frames were rejected with a rate-limited warning;
conn_count remained 1, and the static RF connection was not shadowed.
Verified with module compilation and checkpatch.pl (0 errors, 0 warnings).
Thanks,
Yuchao Zhang
Yuchao Zhang (1):
nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP
include/net/nfc/nci_core.h | 1 +
net/nfc/nci/core.c | 2 ++
net/nfc/nci/rsp.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 2:04 zjamg [this message]
2026-09-18 2:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zjamg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918020412.82878-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--to=ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe.ricard@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®