From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] sctp: check return value of sctp_get_af_specific in sctp_process_init
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:39:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918033942.85061-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com> (raw)
This patch fixes a NULL pointer dereference in sctp_process_init()
that a remote peer can trigger on kernels built with CONFIG_IPV6=n.
Problem description:
In sctp_process_init(), when a COOKIE ECHO arrives from a source
address different from the one recorded in its cookie, the embedded
address parameters of the INIT chunk carried in the cookie are walked
to re-validate the source:
af = sctp_get_af_specific(param_type2af(param.p->type));
if (!af->from_addr_param(&addr, param.addr,
chunk->sctp_hdr->source, 0))
continue;
On CONFIG_IPV6=n kernels the IPv6 address family is never registered
and sctp_get_af_specific(AF_INET6) returns NULL. A peer that completes
the INIT/INIT ACK exchange over IPv4 with an SCTP_PARAM_IPV6_ADDRESS
parameter embedded in its INIT, and then sends the COOKIE ECHO from a
different source address (as a multihomed peer legitimately may), makes
the walk dereference NULL, crashing the kernel in softirq context
without any authentication.
Fix:
Add an explicit NULL check for af in sctp_process_init() to skip
unsupported address family parameters, aligning with the other
from_addr_param call sites in net/sctp/input.c and
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c.
Tested and verified style-compliant with checkpatch.pl
(0 errors, 0 warnings).
Yuchao Zhang (1):
sctp: check return value of sctp_get_af_specific in sctp_process_init
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 3:39 Yuchao Zhang [this message]
2026-09-18 3:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Yuchao Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918033942.85061-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--to=ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®