Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection

[Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>]

> Hi Andrea,

> Hope I ain't got anything wrong, I'm a bit sick.


> The sched_smt_active() check on select_idle_smt_cpu seems to be redundant on here.

> We could remove this
> By moving the check on select_idle_smt_cpu() to goto block and
> adding one check before the select_idle_smt_cpu() on select_task_rq_fair(). And just calling
> select_idle_smt_cpu() on here.

> I also have a question, do we need select_idle_smt() call on here? If yes then why? I was really confused while reading.

> Thanks,
> Kayra :_:

After I don't know how much times of reading the same functions, I finally understand.
Because of has_idle_core is false, we search if there are any idle SMP's on 
any of the cores.

I normally was going to send this alot earlier, but I fall asleep after
realizing this.

Also now, I don't think we need to remove the checks for one place. It complicates things,
when I tried.

I also booted the patch, it did not worked on me since I just have a regular SMT2.
So, that was the waited behavior.

So, here's this:
Tested-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>

Annnddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd....

This: 
Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>

Thanks,
Kayra :-)