From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:14:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026091807-coma-unraveled-a65f@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918060826.8434-1-adarshdas950@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 11:38:26AM +0530, Adarsh Das wrote:
> @@ -804,14 +810,19 @@ static int uevent_net_init(struct net *net)
>
> static void uevent_net_exit(struct net *net)
> {
> - struct uevent_sock *ue_sk = net->uevent_sock;
> + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk;
>
> - if (sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) {
> - mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
> - list_del(&ue_sk->list);
> - mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
> + {
> + guard(mutex)(&uevent_sock_mutex);
LLMs don't know how to use these correctly, shouldn't this just be a
scoped_guard()? No extra {} like that please, it's not normal kernel
coding style at all.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 14:42 [PATCH] " Adarsh Das
2026-09-17 14:51 ` Greg KH
2026-09-17 15:18 ` Adarsh Das
2026-09-17 15:21 ` Greg KH
2026-09-17 17:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Adarsh Das
2026-09-17 17:08 ` Adarsh Das
2026-09-17 17:40 ` Greg KH
2026-09-18 6:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Adarsh Das
2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH
2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-09-18 9:43 ` [PATCH v4] " Adarsh Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026091807-coma-unraveled-a65f@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adarshdas950@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®